DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posts: 482
Posted:
At my HOA, everybody claims that everything is a liability issue.
Burnt out light bulb? Liability issue. Somebody walking at night might get raped and sue.
Crack in the sidewalk? Liability issue. Somebody might trip and sue.
Decaying wood bark on the playground? Liability issue. Kids might get wood bark slivers in their eyes and their parents would sue.
Fence with splinters? Liability issue. Somebody might hurt their hand and sue.
Old playground equipment? Liability issue. Kids might fall off, hurt themselves and sue.
Not enough bark in the playground area? Liability issue. Kids might fall off the play structure, miss the bark, break a leg and sue.
No speed bumps? Liability issue. College kids might crash and hit or kill somebody's kid and the parents sue the HOA because "we should'a had more speed bumps".
No fence? Liability issue. If there was a fence, strangers wouldn't be able to just walk in and steal our stuff. It'd be the HOA's fault!
ADA? Liability issue. Maybe old or disabled people live in our HOA and will sue under the ADA.
Whatever an owner might want done, the first argument out of his mouth is: "It's a liability issue!"
I've even used it myself. If I wanted something, I'd just start screaming about liability.
But I reached a certain point where I concluded that liability is overused and insane. If the criteria is "possible liability", then you can always make a case for that.
But that's different than "probable liability". But what is probable liability?
Is that "somebody is likely to get seriously hurt or killed in the next few days"? Almost nothing qualifies under that.
What do you think the criteria should be?
Of these issues above, what do you think is a real liability issue and what can be delayed?
Burnt out light bulb? Liability issue. Somebody walking at night might get raped and sue.
Crack in the sidewalk? Liability issue. Somebody might trip and sue.
Decaying wood bark on the playground? Liability issue. Kids might get wood bark slivers in their eyes and their parents would sue.
Fence with splinters? Liability issue. Somebody might hurt their hand and sue.
Old playground equipment? Liability issue. Kids might fall off, hurt themselves and sue.
Not enough bark in the playground area? Liability issue. Kids might fall off the play structure, miss the bark, break a leg and sue.
No speed bumps? Liability issue. College kids might crash and hit or kill somebody's kid and the parents sue the HOA because "we should'a had more speed bumps".
No fence? Liability issue. If there was a fence, strangers wouldn't be able to just walk in and steal our stuff. It'd be the HOA's fault!
ADA? Liability issue. Maybe old or disabled people live in our HOA and will sue under the ADA.
Whatever an owner might want done, the first argument out of his mouth is: "It's a liability issue!"
I've even used it myself. If I wanted something, I'd just start screaming about liability.
But I reached a certain point where I concluded that liability is overused and insane. If the criteria is "possible liability", then you can always make a case for that.
But that's different than "probable liability". But what is probable liability?
Is that "somebody is likely to get seriously hurt or killed in the next few days"? Almost nothing qualifies under that.
What do you think the criteria should be?
Of these issues above, what do you think is a real liability issue and what can be delayed?