💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posted:
At my HOA, everybody claims that everything is a liability issue.

Burnt out light bulb? Liability issue. Somebody walking at night might get raped and sue.

Crack in the sidewalk? Liability issue. Somebody might trip and sue.

Decaying wood bark on the playground? Liability issue. Kids might get wood bark slivers in their eyes and their parents would sue.

Fence with splinters? Liability issue. Somebody might hurt their hand and sue.

Old playground equipment? Liability issue. Kids might fall off, hurt themselves and sue.

Not enough bark in the playground area? Liability issue. Kids might fall off the play structure, miss the bark, break a leg and sue.

No speed bumps? Liability issue. College kids might crash and hit or kill somebody's kid and the parents sue the HOA because "we should'a had more speed bumps".

No fence? Liability issue. If there was a fence, strangers wouldn't be able to just walk in and steal our stuff. It'd be the HOA's fault!

ADA? Liability issue. Maybe old or disabled people live in our HOA and will sue under the ADA.

Whatever an owner might want done, the first argument out of his mouth is: "It's a liability issue!"

I've even used it myself. If I wanted something, I'd just start screaming about liability.

But I reached a certain point where I concluded that liability is overused and insane. If the criteria is "possible liability", then you can always make a case for that.

But that's different than "probable liability". But what is probable liability?

Is that "somebody is likely to get seriously hurt or killed in the next few days"? Almost nothing qualifies under that.

What do you think the criteria should be?

Of these issues above, what do you think is a real liability issue and what can be delayed?
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
Daniel,

We both live in California, the litigation capitol of the U.S., where anybody can sue anybody over anything. But just because that might be true (although courts have increasingly thrown cases out for frivolity), there is something called "due diligence" that comes into play. There's even a certain amount of room for common sense that comes into it, or so I'm told, but I couldn't begin to tell you how it works. (-:

I'm not an attorney (I actually work for a living.), but I've seen a lot of crap in the 24 years I've been here, and my experience is that if you take "reasonable" precautions to protect life and limb, you're on fairly defensible ground.

The bottom line for every conceivable issue is risk analysis. How likely is it that the HOA will be successfully sued for bark (or the lack thereof)? On the other hand, how likely is it that the HOA will get screwed if somebody grabs a handrail that is no longer attached to anything, falls and gets hurt?

That's how we look at everything here.

Rob
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
In the good old US of A, you can sue a ham sandwich if you want. The best defense an HOA has is to look at the common sense portion, as well as "what is the typical standard" exhibited by others in similar situations?

Bark in a playground: Could a child be injured? Sure. What are the alternatives? asphalt? sand? recycled rubber? What do other places use? What does the government use? If you are solidly in the middle, you are probably okay. If you are using broken glass, and no one else is, you might be in trouble.

Dead wood: Is it a huge branch that you would remove if it were over your car? then take it down. Is it a twig? don't worry.

AED's in common areas: What are others doing? Does every country club in town have an AED? Does every pool in the county have an AED? if so, perhaps you should get one. If half do, and half don't, then you probably have some breathing room.

Try to compare apples to apples (municipal pool with 5000 visitors a year, versus your pool with 50 are not similar) when you can, and use that common sense thing. As soon as you are created, you start to face risk. Risk cannot be removed from life.

Another trick, use the matrix of Severity/Probability: the more severe the results, the higher the score. the more likely the results will occur, the higher the score. Multiply them together, and then base your actions on the priorities of that scoring system. things that could likely happen, and if they do, will be catastrophic, should be dealt with. Things that aren't likely to every happen, but if they do, would be horrible, can be dealt with later. Things that happen all the time, but don't harm much, can be dealt with after you do the big things bound to happen, etc..

SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
I would think that if the board KNEW about a circumstance and refused to take action on it, it would be a libelous issue., ie. ignoring complaints or residents pointing out uneven sidewalks, resulting in a fall.

RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
In California, "knew" is usually followed by the more nebulous, "or should have known."

Rob
BarbaraD6 (Florida)
Posts: 347
Posted:
Daniel,

If we get a complaint about an issue, or see a problem ourselves we fix it. People are "sue happy' these day and insurance is expensive, so in the long run its cheaper to fix any liability you become aware of.

Barbara
BarbaraB10 (California)
Posts: 117
Posted:
In California, internal and/or alternative dispute resolution (IDR/ADR/mediation) may be required - either attempted, declined or satisfied FIRST before going to court.
CoralF (Iowa)
Posts: 4
Posted:
I'm with Barbara...people are crazy, every time they see the chance they will sue. I fix the liabilities as soon as I possibly can to cover my back. It is way easier this way even though it may seem like a lot of work.

-Coral
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
One thing that I do is walk through the complex with the latest copy of the reserve study, looking at key health and safety components. It's just a way of focusing on all the parts in an organized way.

One year, the reserve study indicated that the hand rails in the stairwells of the condo buildings still had 12 years' worth of life in them, but I discovered that some of them were so corroded that they were no longer attached to anything.

I guess the moral of the story is: cover your butt before it needs it.

Rob
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
It's all good to "fix liabilities as soon as (i) can", but I think the OP was asking "how do you determine what is a real issue, and what can be ignored".

For instance, we may say we fix all liabilities ASAP, but do we really? What about the reduction of lighting on that street lamp, because of dust build up? Do you clean the globe daily? Cracks in the sidewalk.. every crack? cracks over 1/8th inch? Cracks that stick up how far? What about gravel in the road? that's a liability, do we sweep gravel from the roadways every day? Sharp branches in the shrubs... could poke a child's eye out, if they fell into it. Do we cap those? Heck, in Arizona, do you HAVE any landscaping that isn't a liability? Cactus are sharp. Bouganvilla is thorny. Oleander is poisonous. And yet, we plant this and encourage it to grow.

In a condo, when was the last time you tested the heat/AC system for bacteria? when did you last clean the ductlines? When a resident sees a roach, mouse, or housefly, do you fumigate? Those are known vectors for diseases, and liabilities.

Vehicle traffic? is it allowed? that's a liability. Children in the streets? Liability. Children in the front yards? they COULD lose a ball into the street, and go after it. Liability.

If you "fixed" every possible risk/liability every time one occured, you would be a very busy person. You cannot reduce risk (and thus, potential liability) to zero. Only death does that.

The best you can do is decide which liabilities you are willing to expend your resources upon.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
To me, the question can't be answered out of context. It depends on the particular situation, in a particular locale. It needs to be looked at in the big picture, and that means taking what are considered to be generally reasonable precautions in your area.

If, for example, you follow a scheduled lamp replacement maintenance routine that's recommended for that particular lighting system, and a particular light burns out, thus plunging a spot into darkness, and someone happens to be insured or assaulted in that dark spot, they might have a case, but they would have a hard time winning it, even in California.

Lighting is a good example to use, since you could have a person on staff who did nothing but wander from fixture to fixture, 40 hours a week, with a light bulb in hand, just waiting for an opportunity to bring light into the world, but that would be beyond reason for virtually any HOA.

Rob
DanielH1 (California)
Posts: 482
Posted:
I wanted to follow up here.

In my HOA, there really isn't a "definitive" source for the severity of liability. Different Board Members have different opinions; often, one will consider something something a severe liability while another will consider the exact same thing an insignificant liability. The manager is kind of random: nobody believes her opinion.

And, like I said, everybody uses liability as leverage in an argument.

Fix everything sounds great except that it would be insanely expensive and wouldn't happen anyway. Our manager is hardly a robot that chases down every issue until it is dead and buried. She often drops or forgets about stuff. Projects, even "fix it" projects, need a Board champion to pressure and follow up to make sure things happen. Often, these "issues" have no Board champion or the Board is so much against it that the Board champion can't get it done.
BrianS18 (California)
Posts: 1
Posted:
I am a new board member in our community in the sue capital - California. Although these posts are old, they are still relevant today. We added fencing around our developments pool and vandals have broken off a 3 foot section of fencing that was mounted to the top of a block wall. The top of the wall has structure issues and the section cannot just be put back on without some work (probably not very costly). We have had several instances where some pretty sketchy people are climbing over the wall where the missing piece is and vandalizing the area. With this piece being the only missing section around the pool, is the HOA liable if someone jumping over the fence gets hurt or falls into the Jacuzzi and dies? This board is controlled by one person and without a specific code, statue, or case law, she cannot be convinced to fix it.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By BrianS18 on 09/10/2014 4:03 PM
We added fencing around our developments pool and vandals have broken off a 3 foot section of fencing that was mounted to the top of a block wall. The top of the wall has structure issues and the section cannot just be put back on without some work (probably not very costly).

We have had several instances where some pretty sketchy people are climbing over the wall where the missing piece is and vandalizing the area. With this piece being the only missing section around the pool, is the HOA liable if someone jumping over the fence gets hurt or falls into the Jacuzzi and dies? This board is controlled by one person and without a specific code, statue, or case law, she cannot be convinced to fix it.


It sounds like yours is a condo association. The courts have held that a condo association has the same responsibility for ensuring the safety of its residents and visitors as an apartment complex would have.

If the vandals climb the fence they broke down and drown in the hot tub, it is not likely that your association would have much liability. On the other hand, if the vandals come in repeatedly through the unrepaired fence and inflict property damage or personal injury, then you may have a liability problem.

Your association is not helping itself by leaving the fence damaged, especially when the repair is "not very costly."
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Brian,

See http://www.davis-stirling.com/tabid/600/Default.aspx#axzz3CyVrTVcs
JamesO6 (Florida)
Posts: 170
Posted:
Common Area's require Insurance also in case a injury happens like a criminal jumping over 8 foot wood fence and lands in kennel with a dog chained in it and gets bitten by the Dog. If there is no Beware of dog sign on the other side it' a liability issue. Happened in Va Beach Va. Fence jumper won in court for injuries. even if it's open field with nothing on it The HOA can be sued if a bunch of kids playing football on it and brakes a ankle, Parents goanna sue that HOA.
CyrstalB (Maryland)
Posts: 457
Posted:
Call your insurance agent and have them share with the board what liability is and how you as an HOA can avoid it. That's part of their job and it should include their also doing an inspection of some sort. But they have gotten used to sitting in office, collecting money only and pushing paperwork.

Blissful ignorance is not a defense, so if someone were to get hurt and they can show negligence on your part, you will lose. That is where the boards due diligence comes in to play. If you don't make timely inspections, making official notes of what is wrong and then how it is to be fixed, IMHO, it's not an if you will be sued, it's a when.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here