JenniferM10 (Illinois)
Posts: 97
Posts: 97
Posted:
Hi everyone,
I'm just curious if this has happened in other communities. Our meeting was canceled last night because the president said that the two members who were in attendance via video conference did not count, and so a quorum was not present. He apparently had a letter from the HOA lawyer stating that it would only be allowable is all members were given the option to attend via video conference.
Here's what our by-laws say:
Section 4. Quorum. A majority of the number of directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the directors present at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board.
Our by-laws are nearly 30 years old. No one could conceive of such a thing outside of the Jetsons back then. I'm annoyed on two counts 1) that the BOD isn't communicating with each other and seeming to "go to war" over these things publicly and 2) that HOA money was spent on an attorney to get an opinion on something that frankly could have been decided on by the other BOD.
Just curious about your opinions and experience with this type of thing.
I'm just curious if this has happened in other communities. Our meeting was canceled last night because the president said that the two members who were in attendance via video conference did not count, and so a quorum was not present. He apparently had a letter from the HOA lawyer stating that it would only be allowable is all members were given the option to attend via video conference.
Here's what our by-laws say:
Section 4. Quorum. A majority of the number of directors shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Every act or decision done or made by a majority of the directors present at a duly held meeting at which a quorum is present shall be regarded as the act of the Board.
Our by-laws are nearly 30 years old. No one could conceive of such a thing outside of the Jetsons back then. I'm annoyed on two counts 1) that the BOD isn't communicating with each other and seeming to "go to war" over these things publicly and 2) that HOA money was spent on an attorney to get an opinion on something that frankly could have been decided on by the other BOD.
Just curious about your opinions and experience with this type of thing.