💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DaveG2 (Florida)
Posts: 1
Posted:
In Florida Condo 718 laws is there a statue that protects a unit owner in having a clothesline under our enviromental laws.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
YES

Pursuant to:

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?mode=View%20Statutes&SubMenu=1&App_mode=Display_Statute&Search_String=clothesline&URL=0100-0199/0163/Sections/0163.04.html

163.04Energy devices based on renewable resources.

(1)Notwithstanding any provision of this chapter or other provision of general or special law, the adoption of an ordinance by a governing body, as those terms are defined in this chapter, which prohibits or has the effect of prohibiting the installation of solar collectors, clotheslines, or other energy devices based on renewable resources is expressly prohibited.

(2)A deed restriction, covenant, declaration, or similar binding agreement may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting solar collectors, clotheslines, or other energy devices based on renewable resources from being installed on buildings erected on the lots or parcels covered by the deed restriction, covenant, declaration, or binding agreement. A property owner may not be denied permission to install solar collectors or other energy devices by any entity granted the power or right in any deed restriction, covenant, declaration, or similar binding agreement to approve, forbid, control, or direct alteration of property with respect to residential dwellings and within the boundaries of a condominium unit. Such entity may determine the specific location where solar collectors may be installed on the roof within an orientation to the south or within 45° east or west of due south if such determination does not impair the effective operation of the solar collectors.

(3)In any litigation arising under the provisions of this section, the prevailing party shall be entitled to costs and reasonable attorney’s fees.

(4)The legislative intent in enacting these provisions is to protect the public health, safety, and welfare by encouraging the development and use of renewable resources in order to conserve and protect the value of land, buildings, and resources by preventing the adoption of measures which will have the ultimate effect, however unintended, of driving the costs of owning and operating commercial or residential property beyond the capacity of private owners to maintain. This section shall not apply to patio railings in condominiums, cooperatives, or apartments.

History.—s. 8, ch. 80-163; s. 1, ch. 92-89; s. 14, ch. 93-249; s. 1, ch. 2008-191; s. 3, ch. 2008-227.
EdC5 (Florida)
Posts: 117
Posted:
Just be aware that if your property falls under 718 all you own is "from the paint in"; the "clothesline" statute doesn't give you permission to install one on the association's common property, nor on the condo's patio or balcony.

Edward J Cooke, CMCA, LCAM
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Actually Ed … I would argue that technically it is just the “patio railings” that it would not apply, not any patio itself. The patio living area would fall within “the boundaries of a condominium unit” and is owned by the homeowner.

Per: “This section shall not apply to patio railings in condominiums, cooperatives, or apartments.”
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Every time I read about how the law in Florida has forced itself into the operations of private property I thank God I do not reside there.

Whether it be open meetings, unit owner rights, e-mail use, now issues such as clotheslines. Seems to complicate just about any situation.

IMO when you force blanket rulings on each and ever type of property you increase the effort required to accomplish even the smallest of tasks and disregard what makes each property individual. Certainly not productive.

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Florida is unique in the fact that there are estimated to be over 30,000 HOAs in the State. That is a hell of a lot of people who chose to live with restrictions. Maybe not all of them. but the majority chose to live this way.

Once you gather people into such close proximity, the ugly head of how to manage to keep everyone happy rears up. Florida has done a good job in their HOA laws. Nothing will ever be perfect but when you have this many people on top of each other, there needs to be guideances.

The Renewable Energy laws have nothing to do with HOAs but once they were passed, HOAs had to try and fit them in to already established covenants and restrictions. HOAs are not normally individual properties but one big happy family.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
I think it goes something like this....

The road to HOA hell is paved with good intentions.............

If we allow for everything and protect everyone's rights and put no limitations on anything in the name of savings money, lowering costs and most important making everyone HAPPY, you can bet your bottom dollar it will have the exact opposite affect in the real world when put into use.

We thought that was a good idea becomes why the hell did they do that.

And Donna, lets get to the part about one big happy family.... Did I read that correctly??? Just where would that be?????

DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Jon,

TENNESSEE???
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Donna ... you have a quick mind LOL
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Janet,

Golly gee, thanks. Because of my years in Florida with the 4 rentals in 4 different associations plus my home HOA, I pretty much know what an average HOA is like down there. I have to say, unless you are defiant, apathetic, always looking for a way out, don't like rules or don't like to be told what to do, most HOA's (I stress MOST) are not that bad.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
I agree most are not too bad ... it is the few that run into greedy power hungry mongrals that have trouble.
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Bravo Donna!!!

As far as the clotheslines go---a condo assoiciation cannot prohibit someone from erecting one...BUT they CAN put in restrictions as to when/how/where/what time they can be placed outside. Following the law--but enforcing the rules.
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
You have some good points here Anna. In some states where the statutes are a little more ambiguous I would say possibly go for it. However, Florida seems to eliminate this type of scenario. Take note of the sections bolded below:

… may not prohibit or have the effect of prohibiting
… to approve, forbid, control, or direct alteration of property with respect to residential dwellings and within the boundaries of a condominium unit

Of course I tend to choose my battles carefully ... this one appears to have a potential high ratio in favor of homeowner. Not sure if it would be worth an HOA taking the risk.
AdrianaS (California)
Posts: 48
Posted:
So, if I need to dry my clothe, can I place a temporary thing to dry the cloth, after dry remove, in Florida?
AdrianaS (California)
Posts: 48
Posted:
AnnaD2,
I reside in st petersburg, fl,need a an attorney to respond to a lawsuit against me by the BODirectors. Any one in my area?
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
I'm not clear on what the rights of the homeowners are in regards to patios and decks in the particular complex under discussion, but in my complex, the decks and patios are exclusive-use common area. They may be for the exclusive use of the condominium owner, but they are still common area. That means that the association actually owns the deck or patio. If the homeowner screws or nails a bracket into the walls that enclose the deck or patio, to which a clothesline is attached, and doing so allows rainwater to flow into the structure (which all the unit owners, AKA the association) collectively own, then the association has every right - actually a responsibility - to interfere with this act - regardless of the intention of the homeowner. It's not the association interfering with the unit owner's freedom or desire to be a responsible consumer of limited resources, but rather the association safeguarding the property owned by all of the homeowners.

To me, this is the essence of the problem facing all HOA's. On the one hand, individual homeowners want to be free to do whatever they wish to do, which is a right that many people coming from renter reality to home ownership reality rightly or wrongly believe is their due; on the other hand, the only reason many people who own homes in common interest developments can even claim the status of "home owner" is because they have joined their fortunes with a mob of people chosen at random, and have agreed to live with them by a set of conditions that define what they can do and what they can't do - without first reading or understanding the documents that describe them.

Think for a moment how crazy that sounds.

Rob
JanetB2 (Colorado)
Posts: 4,219
Posted:
Adriana: The way the statute reads is if you own the property you are placing the "temporary thing" upon then YES. If it is common area owned by the HOA then the answer to your question would be NO. Be sure to determine if it is in your deed as owning the property.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

In Florida, most decks, patios and balconies are considered "Limited Common Area" in condos which means that the HOA owns the space but it is designated as for use only to the deed holder. With that in mind, the owner is usually responsible for maintenance of that space but for repair and replacement, the HOA holds that responsibility. Once the space is considered "limited", the owner then has more freedom to use that space and may well be allowed to dry things on a temporary line. Documents are now being addressed to include this most ambiguous law. IF the State wants to allow for clothesline drying, they did a really poor job by allowing for placement of the lines in condos, where there actually is no space for lines other than on limited or common areas.
RobW (California)
Posts: 279
Posted:
It seems to me that there are three issues here.

First, leaving the fact that this is an HOA out of it, we have energy conservation: use the sun and air to dry clothes. No valid argument that this is not a good thing.

Second: The HOA has an obligation to ensure that no commonly-owned property is damaged if homeowners run clotheslines on their decks or patios.

Third: The HOA has an obligation to ensure that the community remains an attractive place for all homeowners, visually.

All three of these issues need to be addressed - not just one or two. That means the HOA needs to formalize a policy about energy conservation, and not just as it concerns clothes drying. All of the common areas need to be integrated into a comprehensive plan that will reduce the carbon footprint, and that should include everything from common area electric and gas usage to looking at potential forms of alternative energy generation.

The bottom line for clothes drying should be, at the very least, that the HOA find a solution that does not harm the structure, and that has some sort of uniformity of appearance, and then publish it in a separate policy document, if it can't be added to an existing architectural control policy.

My 2 cents on it.

Rob
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
AdrianaS
--- you claim to need an attorney.....just WHAT exactly is your Board of Directors suing you for???? If you could give us some information perhaps we could help you.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here