πŸ’¬ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
I have searched the forum but couldn't find an answer to this specific question. All the other topics dealt with homeowners not paying their assessment and the Association trying to turn the water off.

We have two Associations that share the water bill from the local utility company. The same utility company bills the homeowner for electricity and garbage separately. We utilize a national utility billing service to bill the homeowners for the water they use. They collect from the homeowners and deposit the funds into our account.

If the homeowner doesn't pay their water bill, do you think the HOA would or should have the power to shut the water off, just as the utility company would. If we don't pay the other Association, the Cost Sharing Agreement between the two entities allows for them to turn the water off to our entire Association.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Richard,

I'm not positive that it's an issue of people thinking you can or can not turn the water off. I think it would be an issue of does the law allow the association to do this. That should be the first question. If the law supports it then ask the second question. If the law says you can not, then the question is pointless.

Every State probably has different laws addressing this.

Tim
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Abso-freakin-lutely they should have the power to shut off the water to non-payers just like a utility company can but unfortunately I believe that Virginia is the only state it is legal to do so. In Ohio we can do it for commercial condos but not residential. I mean we wouldn't want to cause the non-payers any hardship or inconvenience, it might damage their self esteem. There would however have to be some method for people who are ill or disable to keep the water on just like a utility must. See I'm not totally heartless like some have intimated.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Empty homes or units?
Absolutely yes.

It gets sticky when there's kids or elderly in the home.

Better to file lien.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i like to point out that it is perfectly legal to shut off the water for emergency repairs.

we used to have emergency repairs at the worst imaginable times for some of our deadbeat owners, right when they were showering for work, etc..
JeanneK3 (Maryland)
Posts: 562
Posted:
I believe shutting off water to a residence will result in a citation from the Board of Health.
Jeanne
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Jeanne,

so, if the city/county shuts off the water to a home for non-payment, does the health dept issue them a citation?
JohnO6 (Georgia)
Posts: 424
Posted:
Jeanne,

so, if the city/county shuts off the water to a home for non-payment, does the health dept issue them a citation?
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Our board puts a 8 x 10" brightly colored shut-off notice on the front door of the home. After that, someone will come out and spraypaint the area of the property where the shut-off valve is and where the digging will be commenced.

About 99% of the past due accounts get some action on them, at that point.

JamesC (Maryland)
Posts: 282
Posted:
This has come up many times at our board meetings. Other homeowners are tired of dead beats not paying their monthly fees, thereby stealing the services paid for by others.
To those posters bringing up hardships as a result of cutting off someones water, there is no mercy shown by the gas/electric companies when one's electric is turned off for non-payment.

Unfortunately in Maryland, and the Private Community we live in, all homes share the same water line, and the Association pays one bill. Each home has an emergency turn off valve in their front yard, but no meter. Turning this valve off would require trespassing onto the homeowners private property.
If we had the means to turn the water off without going onto the property, it would have been done years ago.
It is disturbing to all good homeowners who pay their fees to see others who owe thousands of dollars to the Association washing their cars, and watering their lawns.
Where is the justice in that?????

Jim
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Jim,

Why not negotiate with the water company to put meters in for each lot. Even if the Association picks up some of the cost, it will save money in the long run.

Tim
JamesC (Maryland)
Posts: 282
Posted:
Tim:

Althrough our homes (167) are located in Baltimore County, the water is owned/controlled by Baltimore City, because they also own all the reserviors.
We have nine homeowners who have not paid their fees for many years, and as of last months financial report they along with short term deliquents owe over $29,000.
The thought of what you suggest has been brought up several times, but would it be worth the huge financial outlay the Association would incur by having to pay for the installation of meters on all the homes, just because nine or ten irresponsibile homeowners won't meet their obligations?. Besides since we are a Private Community on Private Property, we are responsible for everything. (snow removal, trash pick-up, lawn maintenance, water, etc.)
All we have been able to do is take the lien route, but they know how to play the game. We are now looking into going after wage garnishments.
I learned about another Association who took the deliquent fees issue to court. A judge in Baltimore County ruled, since debts are public knowledge it was legal for them to publish homeowners names, and addresses in their community newsletter.
Our attorney however advises against taking such actions.

Thanks:

Jim

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Thanks for all the good advise.

I don't know what kind of problem we have until I have access to the billing service's online system. Water is from the City of Los Angeles and they have a written policy for non-payment of bills which we will follow, again not shutting off to elderly or disabled.

Our meters were not put in by LADWP, but by the builder, so we or the manager of the water system has to read the meters and then bill the homeowners. Even though the billing collects from the homeowners, the Association is liable for the bill whether people pay or not.

We just formed a Water Committee to deal with this issue, as well as trying to conserve water for the Association common area and helping resident conserve as well. They will also help in re-writing the Cost Sharing Agreement with the other Association. Our health department is with the county and hell wil freeze over long before they would show up.
SteveM9 (Massachusetts)
Posts: 3,699
Posted:
Each house must have a water shut off in the yard. So if a homeowner needed work done to their house, you don't have to shut down the entire neighborhood.

Notify each owner. Next, turn each delinquent homeowner's water down to a trickle using the shutoff in the yard. Just enough for medications, etc, but not enough to shower or enjoy water.

Should only cost about $100 to send someone out to dig out the valve and turn it down.

Next, watch the payments come in.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By JamesC on 01/11/2011 7:04 AM
Tim:

The thought of what you suggest has been brought up several times, but would it be worth the huge financial outlay the Association would incur by having to pay for the installation of meters on all the homes, just because nine or ten irresponsibile homeowners won't meet their obligations?. Besides since we are a Private Community on Private Property, we are responsible for everything. (snow removal, trash pick-up, lawn maintenance, water, etc.)

You would need to see how much savings the Association would have by not paying the water bill for everyone, including the potential ability to better cover delinquent accounts. I suspect that the Association would save money over the long term. How long it would take to break even you would have to figure out.

Question, did anyone actually contact the utilities to see what the cost would be or was it just discussed as an option without getting hard numbers?
AnnaD2 (Florida)
Posts: 960
Posted:
Richard, could you please update your profile and let the rest of us know which state you are in? You may receive a lot more helpful responses from a lot more people who can help you if we know where you're from!

We LOVE to help and would like to help you more!
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Not sure why the state doesn' show up. I'm from California
SusanaA (California)
Posts: 1
Posted:
Richard Please let me know if you ever solved the problem from the person not paying the water bill. We also have the same problem. I want to know f we can shut it off.
LarryB13 (Arizona)
Posts: 4,099
Posted:
Richard,

Since you are in California, this snippet from Davis-Sterling may help (although I have my doubts, see below):

QUESTION: Is it possible to partially turn off water for delinquent owners? For instance, can the association install turn-off valves for the unit so the deadbeat owner has some water but making it difficult for him to either bathe or do his dishes?

ANSWER: California's Supreme Court has determined that associations are "for all practical purposes" a landlord. (Francis T v. Village Green.) Under landlord-tenant law, landlords may not willfully cause, "directly or indirectly," the interruption or termination of utility service to a tenant's residence with the intent to terminate occupancy. Utilities covered include, but are not limited to, water, heat, light, electricity, telephone, gas, elevators and refrigeration. (Civ. Code Β§789.3.) Cable TV does not qualify as a utility.

Read more: Turning Off Utilities http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/TurningOffWater/tabid/2610/Default.aspx#ixzz3J0FgjTMi
from Davis-Stirling.com by Adams Kessler PLC. If your association needs legal assistance, call us at (800) 464-2817.

As is often the case, Adams Kessler has over-reached with at least part of this analysis. The issue before the court in Francis T was security in a condominium complex and the court held that the condo association had the same duty to protect its residents and guests as a landlord in an apartment complex. I cannot imagine any circumstance where the court would hold that an HOA in a community of detached single-family homes is "a landlord."

It is also less than certain that a condo association is deemed to be a landlord in all circumstances. Even less certain is whether residential landlord-tenant statutes would apply to a condo association. If you follow Adams Kessler's logic to its conclusion, the association would have the right to evict an owner for non-payment of his water bill.

If was running the show, I would arrange for emergency water shutoffs at all the deadbeats' units.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Susana,

If you are from Sylmar, I believe we know each other.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Larry

I agree with you 200%.
JohnB26 (South Carolina)
Posts: 1,001
Posted:
lien and then begin foreclosing

I doubt that they won't pay up

if they don't, the dead-beat will be gone

then, while the house sits empty, no water will be used
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:

As noted above some states preclude such self-help remedies by HOAs :

Florida : Sun Sentinel Nov 6 2014 attorney Lindsay Raphael : http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/condoblog/2014/11/question-can-a-condominium-association-turn-off-your-water-if-you-don%E2%80%99t-pay-your-assessments.html

"Question: Can a condominium association turn off your water if you don’t pay your assessments ?"
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
That is not applicable in our situation.
BobD4 (up north)
Posts: 1,002
Posted:
of course, unless California is bound by Florida state law.

As to your second invited issue if state law allows such : "If the homeowner doesn't pay their water bill, do you think the HOA would or SHOULD have the power to shut the water off ? "

Where defaulters of all sorts of utilities are not directly metered customers of an arms-length utility company, not much defence for the unfairness of someone getting a free ride (while complying consumers struggle).

But self-help remedies frighten me almost as much, including the inaccuracy/accuracy of billing calculations whether from utility companies themselves or from skillset challenged middlemen. Our jurisdiction privatized an efficient, credible (but grotesquely taxpayer subsidized) electric power supply environment years; now it sends out thousands of bills sometimes months late for often wildly inaccurate consumptions in bizarre lingo- think "Here's your bill for $1 million this month . . "). Even getting a bill is sometimes tough.

Lawful collections & liens should be lawfully & even-handedly pursued as early as legally possible.
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
As of this date, there is no California Law that would not allow the disconnection of a sub-metered device, and the shutting of the water until the bill is brought current.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • βœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • βœ“ Share your experience
  • βœ“ Get expert advice
  • βœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account β†’

⚑ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here