๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
My understanding here in California and in our own HOA we can NOT remove dead beats via foreclosure. Something in law about creditors can not force the sell of home, but a lien can be placed on it. Thats about all...
NoeW (Alaska)
Posts: 25
Posted:
Here's one I found awhile back when researching the issue.

It's somewhere in South Florida though not Ca.

http://www.ccfj.net/WPEC12Newsforecl.html
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Yes, they happen.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Since most HOA's receive little or no money from a foreclosure action, most will wait until the lender forecloses. This is the D-S Statute on foreclosures:

Civil Code ยง1367.4. Limitations on Foreclosure.

(a) Notwithstanding any law or any provisions of the governing documents to the contrary, this section shall apply to debts for assessments that arise on and after January 1, 2006.

(b) An association that seeks to collect delinquent regular or special assessments of an amount less than one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800), not including any accelerated assessments, late charges, fees and costs of collection, attorney's fees, or interest, may not collect that debt through judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure, but may attempt to collect or secure that debt in any of the following ways:

(1) By a civil action in small claims court, pursuant to Chapter 5.5 (commencing with Section 116.110) of Title 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. An association that chooses to proceed by an action in small claims court, and prevails, may enforce the judgment as permitted under Article 8 (commencing with Section 116.810) of Title 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The amount that may be recovered in small claims court to collect upon a debt for delinquent assessments may not exceed the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court and shall be the sum of the following:

(A) The amount owed as of the date of filing the complaint in the small claims court proceeding.

(B) In the discretion of the court, an additional amount to that described in subparagraph (A) equal to the amount owed for the period from the date the complaint is filed until satisfaction of the judgment, which total amount may include accruing unpaid assessments and any reasonable late charges, fees and costs of collection, attorney's fees, and interest, up to the jurisdictional limits of the small claims court.

(2) By recording a lien on the owner's separate interest upon which the association may not foreclose until the amount of the delinquent assessments secured by the lien, exclusive of any accelerated assessments, late charges, fees and costs of collection, attorney's fees, or interest, equals or exceeds one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) or the assessments are more than 12 months delinquent. An association that chooses to record a lien under these provisions, prior to recording the lien, shall offer the owner and, if so requested by the owner, participate in dispute resolution as set forth in Article 5 (commencing with Section 1368.810) of Chapter 4.

(3) Any other manner provided by law, except for judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure.

(c) An association that seeks to collect delinquent regular or special assessments of an amount of one thousand eight hundred dollars ($1,800) or more, not including any accelerated assessments, late charges, fees and costs of collection, attorney's fees, or interest, or any assessments that are more than 12 months delinquent, may use judicial or nonjudicial foreclosure subject to the following conditions:

(1) Prior to initiating a foreclosure on an owner's separate interest, the association shall offer the owner and, if so requested by the owner, participate in dispute resolution pursuant to the association's "meet and confer" program required in Article 5 (commencing with Section 1363.810) of Chapter 4 or alternative dispute resolution as set forth in Article 2 (commencing with Section 1369.510) of Chapter 7. The decision to pursue dispute resolution or a particular type of alternative dispute resolution shall be the choice of the owner, except that binding arbitration shall not be available if the association intends to initiate a judicial foreclosure.

(2) The decision to initiate foreclosure of a lien for delinquent assessments that has been validly recorded shall be made only by the board of directors of the association and may not be delegated to an agent of the association. The board shall approve the decision by a majority vote of the board members in an executive session. The board shall record the vote in the minutes of the next meeting of the board open to all members. The board shall maintain the confidentiality of the owner or owners of the separate interest by identifying the matter in the minutes by the parcel number of the property, rather than the name of the owner or owners. A board vote to approve foreclosure of a lien shall take place at least 30 days prior to any public sale.

(3) The board shall provide notice by personal service to an owner of a separate interest who occupies the separate interest or to the owner's legal representative, if the board votes to foreclose upon the separate interest. The board shall provide written notice to an owner of a separate interest who does not occupy the separate interest by first-class mail, postage prepaid, at the most current address shown on the books of the association. In the absence of written notification by the owner to the association, the address of the owner's separate interest may be treated as the owner's mailing address.

(4) A nonjudicial foreclosure by an association to collect upon a debt for delinquent assessments shall be subject to a right of redemption. The redemption period within which the separate interest may be redeemed from a foreclosure sale under this paragraph ends 90 days after the sale.

(d) The limitation on foreclosure of assessment liens for amounts under the stated minimum in this section does not apply to assessments owed by owners of separate interests in timeshare estates, as defined in subdivision (x) of Section 11112 of the Business and Professions Code, or to assessments owed by developers.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
The Catch-22 for us is this: If we don't aggressively try to collect, then our auditors/property manager reports the increasing dues delinquencies.. If we reach foreclosure, then we stand to lose our uncollected dues AND legal bills incurred to collect our debt.

HOA's lose by foreclosing. But, HOA's die slow deaths by not protecting their revenue stream by virtue that it "isn't worth it" to forcefully attempt collections due to the expense.

My HOA's margin is less than 3% for 2010. We have no choice or the majority of on-time payers lose amenities and confidence.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
In Georgia the Property Owners Association Act (POAA) makes it easier for an association to foreclose on deadbeat members. We can foreclose with the first mortgage in place so long as the debt exceeds $2,000. Our policy is to obtain a judgement including the option of foreclosure as soon as the debt reaches $2,000. With that leverage we usually get the homeowner to pay up.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
Same in NC regarding foreclosing with superior liens in place......However, who wants to buy a house at auction and THEN be told what the amount owed on the mortgage is?

I think this is how you hear of reports of buying a house for $1,500. Yes, you buy the home for $1,500, which satisfies one debt, but then a bank calls you to say, "Hey, this property has an existing $140,000 lien on it."

LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Kelly,

You are right on the mark as to the uncertainty in foreclosing with a superior loan in place. The reason an HOA may want to do this is (1) it might encourage the homeowner to settle up to stop the foreclosure if there is equity in the property, and (2) to "stop the bleeding" by getting a deadbeat homeowner to move out of the neighborhood if there is no equity. In the case where the HOA forecloses on a property that is under water, the bank will then foreclose out from under the HOA and the HOA will be rid of the problem. At no time will the HOA be responsible for payments on the loan that they inherited. The HOA's exposure is only the attorney's fees for the judgment, foreclosure, and other services.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
In late 2009, our property manager told us our HOA had, statistically, the highest number of delinquent dues payers if her 17 properties. We inquired where our collection policy was deficient.

1. After 15 days delinquent, our HOA was, through the management company, sending a "nice reminder" letter that had no legal strength to ask for the payment. State law, which had recently been tightened to be more "payer friendly," called for sending a demand letter at 15 days past due. We were being friendly.

2. The HOA board had requested/ruled that the board vote on EVERY procedural step of the foreclosure, which is legally unnecessary and opened up subjectiveness of opinion at every stage of collections. Our By-laws said the board "Shall" collect or move to collect on all dues over 30 days delinquent, including foreclosure.

Those two board policies meant that the HOA would not begin legally notifying delinquent home owners until their account was 30 days past due. For example, a home owner who missed a payment due on November 1st would not receive an initial collection letter before the first week of January. By then, the HOA could be missing the November, December and January payments without any communication with the home owner or from the home owner.

Our board meets once a month. Therefore, under the failing collections plan, we would slow the collections process unnecessarily by voting on collections maneuvers every thirty days for items that should be addressed every 15 days if we followed state law in NC. That's a 50% slowdown in the process.

OUR SOLUTION?

1. We eliminated the "nice guy" letter that carried zero weight.

2. We instructed the property manager to follow NC collections law to the letter.

3. We followed attorney advice and eliminated the step-by-step vote requirement for EVERY collections step, because sending letters is procedural.

4. We followed attorney advice and cut our collections votes at HOA meetings to those just prior to authorizing foreclosure and authorizing the auction.

5. If the lawyer needs additional votes, we consider and vote as requested but do not apply "HOA Board Expertise" to the equation.

THE RESULT?

In 2009, we closed the budget books with about 15 properties sitting past-due by more than 30 days facing legal demand letters under the old collections system.

In 2010, we'll close the books with 1 property as highly delinquent (has been since late 2008 and is a remnant of the old collections system)

We have not placed any property's deed in the HOA's name but we've gotten close.

TerryB2 (California)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Not anymore baby. Check this out. Lending banks are now being held accountable for the trap they set, borrowing money they didn't themselves have, while using loose and illegal practices in the process. The MASSIVE lawsuit against Wells Fargo / Wachovia, Indymac / OneWest bank, Citibank, Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, GMAC..............can actually, not only put a stop to your foreclosure, but also pause your house payments with no loss to you............
***SPAM LINK REMOVED ***
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Terry,

That link has nothing to do with Associations starting the foreclosure process. It's about taking legal action against banks who failed to fully investigate and properly cross the t's and dot the i's in their foreclosure motions.

Tim
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Tim,

The post was spam attempting to sell some product by a poster with only the one post. I have reported it to the Support team.
DianeW (Maryland)
Posts: 147
Posted:
Our HOA has a deadbeat developer who is required to pay dues on lots still owned by him. He has 45 lots and has not paid dues in years. We filed liens and had lawyers contact him over and over demanding payment. Still nothing. We are now trying to pursue foreclosure but have been told the cost will be upwards of $20,000. There is no way we can afford that kind of expenditure. I can certainly understand why foreclosures happen so seldom. BTW - there is no bank involved here as the developer owns the property free and clear. It is very discouraging!
FionaC (California)
Posts: 212
Posted:
I just know that I found out here in California that past debts can not be used to cause foreclosure, but rather be added to a lien on the property. THe guy who lives below me owes the better part of 15k in past dues.. nothing, nothing can be done. Except pushing a lein on his property..
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
California possesses its own host of state policies much different than other U.S. states. The fact an HOA can't forcefully collect dues is a disservice to all the dues payers in your neighborhood.

There is a price to pay and raising HOA dues on honorable residents because deadbeats won't adhere to their responsibility and can't be forced to is quite bothersome.

We have 236 properties. If merely 12 properties decide not to pay (one already is non-paying), then the HOA cannot save for reserves but could follow its budget and hope for no disaster on the maintenance front. More than 12 chronic delinquencies and our HOA will enter negative cash flow.

12 of 236 properties isn't a big percentage but would wreck the HOA's ability to operate its pool and other amenities people demand.

We must be aggressive and our current dues payers have backed us.
PeterD3 (Florida)
Posts: 708
Posted:
Here's a "fresh one" from today's paper:

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/business/realestate/condos/fl-foreclosure-purchases-condocol-01120110111,0,5530901.column
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
I guarantee you the HOA, Boca Greens, was the only bidder and thus stuck with a complete write-off of its lost dues, not to mention, the first lienholder will now accelerate the loan that property secures to require immediate and full satisfaction of the loan or a bank foreclosure ensues.

I'm torn on the permanent strategy of HOA ownership of a condo for the purpose of renting it........

The foreclosure action is the last and best hope of finding a new property owner who'll pay dues so the other residents don't carry the dues delinquency. I've never been part of our HOA's discussion where we didn't explore the options or wonder why the property owner isn't communicating. Once an account gets two months' behind, the attorney is the contact person. Any conversations outside the attorney negotiating with a home owner is improper.

Boy, this is tough, disheartening and any other negative sentiment you could imagine. If an HOA forecloses, it's an act of heartlessness. If it lets people not pay dues, it costs amenities and reflects willful, fiscal negligence. I really don't see a middle ground.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Kelly,

There may be an option short of foreclosure. In Georgia if you get a judgment against the debtor in court, then you can follow up with a fieri facias that targets "the goods and chattels" of the defendant. At this point the HOA can garnish wages, attach bank accounts, or even have the sheriff take possession of their 50 inch TV. It's a more appropriate response to overdue assessments.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
We've never inquired about the option you outline but I have read about it as a collections strategy. I am happy to know that this is not a problem, currently, with our HOA (1 of 236 properties). It makes you feel uncomfortable.
RN (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
In florida they do. Our HOA has done it and now rents the homes to re-coup funds.
KellyM3 (North Carolina)
Posts: 2,239
Posted:
RN,

What is your HOA board's exit strategy regarding the renting of unit and its potential sale in the future?

We're thinking on our board that if we foreclosed and rented the property beyond collecting what's owed to us, we're profit-seeking. We are, of course, non-profit.

RN (Florida)
Posts: 4
Posted:
Kelly

As of now, we don't have a solid exit strategy, as we don't anticipate being in any sort of profit making position for a long time.

Unfortunately for us, many of these people are at least $15,000 (or more) in arrears. By the time we repay legal fees, the commission on the rental of the property, the insurance and whatever repairs we had to do for the home to get it ready and then back assessments, we hope the bank will have taken over by then.

If it came to a point where we would be in a profit position, I would just assume we would stop renting the property at that point (we would assess our position every time we were to renew a lease)

KhalidQ (Georgia)
Posts: 3
Posted:
I am new to the site and I have a question, if the homwowner cannot make full payment at one time and agree to make the payment in installment, will the court agree to that terms.In my case even though I tried everything possible, the HOA intentionally dragged the case so that they can assess as much fine as possible and now they have field the suite. What other options does he have in Georgia. Can some one help me.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Khalid,

When a homeowner works out a payment plan it usually stops all collection activity -- so long as the homeowner continues to abide by the terms of the payment agreement.

After the HOA gets a judgement against a homeowner the opportunity to work out a payment plan or dispute the charges is usually lost. It is in every one's best interest to negotiate some accommodation as early as possible.
KhalidQ (Georgia)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Lawrence, Thank you very much for all your help. I tried all resources but they want to get me to court. I am trying to reach them through other home owners to resolve it. Earlier also, when 20 home owners signed a letter to HOA to resolve the issue within the community and home owners did not have any problem with my house color, HOA did not agree. Is their any free help or attorney because I cannot afford to pay. I have another 14 days to send the response to the court. Please help.
LawrenceC1 (Georgia)
Posts: 480
Posted:
Khalid,

I sympathize with your situation. I am sorry that things have gotten to this point.

It sounds like there has been a serious breakdown in understanding the nature of an HOA.

Whether or not other homeowners like your house color makes no difference -- it is the Architectural Control Committee, or similar group, that makes an official determination about what color you can paint your house.

The time to talk to the HOA about a payment plan for your dues is before you get behind in your payments, not after things have gotten all the way to the court.

Being a member of an HOA can have great benefits, but can also lead to serious problems if you are on the wrong side of the obligations of each member.

You should reach out to the HOA board and work out an arrangement. You should contact the board directly and not rely on going through other homeowners. The key will be to acknowledge your mistakes up to now and pledge compliance with all rules in the future. I hope that things work out for you.
KhalidQ (Georgia)
Posts: 3
Posted:
Thanks Lawrence, I will try to work with the HOA which I been doing all the time and see if it can be resolved soon.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here