💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

PeterB1 (Florida)
Posts: 257
Posted:
We (HOA in Florida) have just received a request from a resident (1) to inspect all financial records from Jan 1, 1985 to present and (2) to inspect all the historic records of the Architectural Review Board (ARB). Through previous correspondence with the resident, we suspect they continue to try to prove they should not pay 3 assessments for the 3 lots they own.

The ‘why’ in this case is really not relevant. The 'how' we do this is the issue we are faced with. Florida statute is clear that we must allow inspection of official records, allow copying, and we may not require a statement of purpose. I need your suggestions as to how we accomplish this.

We are only required (by FL 720) to maintain financial records for 7 years. I am pretty sure that we do not have good records that far back. Various bookkeepers have worked on the account 5+ years ago. I am not aware of any specific record retention requirements for ARB records.

How do I go about allowing access, but still retain some semblance of privacy and confidentiality for our residents?

Our financial records are maintained on a computer system. How do I ask our accountant to provide access? May I charge the hourly rate of the accountant to provide the requested ‘inspection’ capability?

How do I provide access to historical ARB records which are maintained by an outside firm? May I charge them the hourly rate of the architect who maintains these files?

Are there any ‘legal’ constraints I can place on this request so that it does not become a fishing trip?

Thanks.
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Peter,

I have posted the 720:303 (5) statute on Inspection of Records so that the others may read them. Your "suspicion" on his reason for this request does not sound like that makes sense. Your ByLaws and CC&Rs would tell him that he pays equal assessments for every parcel that he owns, just like everyone else. Show him that part if you believe this is what is motivating him.

Your Board has the right to charge him for every page that you copy for him after the intital 25 pages.You only need to have copy of the last 7 years so let him forget about records from 1985. Say What??? is the purpose of that.

5) INSPECTION AND COPYING OF RECORDS.--The official records shall be maintained within the state and must be open to inspection and available for photocopying by members or their authorized agents at reasonable times and places within 10 business days after receipt of a written request for access. This subsection may be complied with by having a copy of the official records available for inspection or copying in the community. If the association has a photocopy machine available where the records are maintained, it must provide parcel owners with copies on request during the inspection if the entire request is limited to no more than 25 pages.

(a) The failure of an association to provide access to the records within 10 business days after receipt of a written request creates a rebuttable presumption that the association willfully failed to comply with this subsection.

(b) A member who is denied access to official records is entitled to the actual damages or minimum damages for the association's willful failure to comply with this subsection. The minimum damages are to be $50 per calendar day up to 10 days, the calculation to begin on the 11th business day after receipt of the written request.

(c) The association may adopt reasonable written rules governing the frequency, time, location, notice, records to be inspected, and manner of inspections, but may not impose a requirement that a parcel owner demonstrate any proper purpose for the inspection, state any reason for the inspection, or limit a parcel owner's right to inspect records to less than one 8-hour business day per month. The association may impose fees to cover the costs of providing copies of the official records, including, without limitation, the costs of copying. The association may charge up to 50 cents per page for copies made on the association's photocopier. If the association does not have a photocopy machine available where the records are kept, or if the records requested to be copied exceed 25 pages in length, the association may have copies made by an outside vendor and may charge the actual cost of copying. The association shall maintain an adequate number of copies of the recorded governing documents, to ensure their availability to members and prospective members. Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the following records shall not be accessible to members or parcel owners:

1. Any record protected by the lawyer-client privilege as described in s. 90.502 and any record protected by the work-product privilege, including, but not limited to, any record prepared by an association attorney or prepared at the attorney's express direction which reflects a mental impression, conclusion, litigation strategy, or legal theory of the attorney or the association and was prepared exclusively for civil or criminal litigation or for adversarial administrative proceedings or which was prepared in anticipation of imminent civil or criminal litigation or imminent adversarial administrative proceedings until the conclusion of the litigation or adversarial administrative proceedings.

2. Information obtained by an association in connection with the approval of the lease, sale, or other transfer of a parcel.

3. Disciplinary, health, insurance, and personnel records of the association's employees.

4. Medical records of parcel owners or community residents.

SureshD
Posts: 268
Posted:
Are there any ‘legal’ constraints I can place on this request so that it does not become a fishing trip?

Do you have something to hide?
The Florida Law above seems pretty clear on recored review. He/She is a member and has the right to "fish" if they want. 10 days is plenty to arrange visits to the offices where the records are kept and parse any of the items prohibited from view.

We had a previous BOD that tried to "constrain" an ARC records review and it ended up costing us $2500.

PeterB1 (Florida)
Posts: 257
Posted:
I thought fishing in Florida required a license!
SureshD
Posts: 268
Posted:
Not in an HOA!

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here