💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

HeatherB4 (Florida)
Posts: 51
Posted:
Our HOA has been making changes to our procudure as far as violations and fines goes. They have consulted with our attorney, and the attorney has put together a legal paper with all the information and so fourth. HOWEVER, our BOD will not let the members see this, they say its attorney client privilege. This paper is between the HOA (BOD and members) and the attorney and I think I should be able to see this, but I could be wrong.

Any thoughts?
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
It's between the attorney and the BOD as trustees of the HOA.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Heather,

The who, what and wheres of all documents are available to HOA members for review. Now, if the paper that the attorney has written concerns an individual or is pertaining to pending litigation or current legal issues against a member or members and there are names listed, then NO, you do not have the right to view those papers. (SEE BELOW)

What type of papers are these? Perhaps the Board is writtinig new procedures on how they want to fine and perhaps lein. Those papers will be available to the membership IF they need to be added to your documents as the members will need to approve them if they are to amend current docs.

720:303, 5.(1) "Notwithstanding the provisions of this paragraph, the following records shall not be accessible to members or parcel owners:

1. Any record protected by the lawyer-client privilege as described in s. 90.502 and any record protected by the work-product privilege, including, but not limited to, any record prepared by an association attorney or prepared at the attorney's express direction which reflects a mental impression, conclusion, litigation strategy, or legal theory of the attorney or the association and was prepared exclusively for civil or criminal litigation or for adversarial administrative proceedings or which was prepared in anticipation of imminent civil or criminal litigation or imminent adversarial administrative proceedings until the conclusion of the litigation or adversarial administrative proceedings.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Heather,

At the time an amendment is proposed you will be able to read the final product. Why do you want to see the info the attorney has given the board? Perhaps they do not want to share this info with the members, which is their right, as it does fall under attorney client privilege.

FYI, from US Legal.com:

Attorney-Client Privilege Law & Legal Definition

Attorney-client privilege is an evidentiary rule that protects communications between a client and his or her attorney and keeps those communications confidential. It protects both attorneys and their clients from being compelled to disclose confidential communications between them made for the purpose of furnishing or obtaining legal advice or assistance. The privilege is designed to foster frank, open, and uninhibited discourse between attorney and client so that the client's legal needs are competently addressed by a fully prepared attorney who is cognizant of all the relevant information the client can provide. The attorney-client privilege may be raised during any type of legal proceeding, civil, criminal, or administrative, and at any time during those proceedings, pre-trial, during trial, or post-trial.

HeatherB4 (Florida)
Posts: 51
Posted:
What has happened is that the BOD has not been placing fines and going after offenders. They have had a LOT of push back from the members and in doing so the BOD decided to redo the violation and fine schedule. Last month at the meeting their was a motion to check with a lawyer. and that is what we want to know... In our by-laws it states very clearly what the schedule is, why do they need an attorney for that? Plus it cost money for such a thing... They don't need a lawyer, just a backbone!!!

Anyway, I found this link I found pretty good...

http://www.floridacondohoalawblog.com/2010/06/articles/board-operations/is-the-attorneyclient-privilege-still-viable-for-floridas-condo-boards/

Thank for all your input
Heather
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Heather,

Are you a condo? It sounds like your Board is trying to get the train back on track.
HeatherB4 (Florida)
Posts: 51
Posted:
Nope, single family HOA.

But we have a pool, gated, and many other things that the HOA have to pay for, and our dues are going up by 20% next year becuase people not paying. Plus, our nieghborhood looks like crap, and nothing is getting done!!!

I would like to know what the lawyer has put out their, and what relationship the HOA, BOD, and the lawyer has with each other, its all very shady!!!
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Heather,

According to the article you referenced,it appears the BOD eliminated their attorney-client privilege by stating in an open meeting that they needed to consult with an attorney. However, I do not see anything wrong with wanting to do this since they are considering amending the violation and fine schedule (the bylaws??). In fact I think it's rather prudent on their part to want to make certain they get it right, legally speaking.
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
You said the board wanted to make changes in "violations and fines." They are consulting with an attorney. Good idea.

When the proposed changes come into play, there should be discussion at a board meeting. Just make sure that you are there for that.

What is it that makes you so uncomfortable about this whole process?
DonnaS (Tennessee)
Posts: 5,671
Posted:

Yes Heather, why are you being so sceptical about what they are consulting the attorney about? They have the right and obligation to make sure that they are handling this properly. It is not your job to police them unless they have shown in the past that they are not legit on HOA matters. Take a breather and wait until they inform the membership what is going on. You do not have the right to know what discussions are between the Board and the Attorney.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Heather:

The increase in your charges as you suggest is due to some not paying their share. Not some misconduct by the Board.

With the depressed economy many Boards are facing issues they have never had to deal with before. Some are not easy to deal with like non=payment of common charges. Just maybe your Board has enough to do right now or more than they can or should be able to handle.

I would agree before you make changes to any By-Laws you should consult an attorney. That is just good practice. There are many options legally some though may not be in the best interest of the property. Best to know the difference before you act.

I would suggest perhaps you wait to find out the details before you condemn the Board's actions. The members are just owners who have volunteered their time and in many cases doing the best they can to the best of their ability.

To now blame them for all that is wrong on your property ( and the property of many others) is misdirected IMO.

You might want to perhaps find a way to assist them and work with them rather than attack them when the detials are not yet out.

Good luck.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here