๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Just closed on Condo at Bethany Bay Resorts, Millville, DE on August 30th. Attended 2011 Budget mtg this past Saturday and the HOA advises that fees will be going up 80% and an add'l Special Assessment of $188,500. Can that happen..... an 80% increase. This is an upscale, absolutely beautiful place with pool, golf course, ponds, right on Indian River Inlet looking out onto Bethany Bay. 80% rise in fees just doesn't see reasonable and just. Any recommendations? Thx.
JeffP6 (Florida)
Posts: 91
Posted:
do you have a copy of your covenants? Check to see how much the dues can be raised. Ours says up to 115% can be done by the Board.

Special Assessment - did they get the necessary votes for that? for us to do one we need 2/3 affirmative - 141 affirmative votes. You dont think that is too har duntil you consider that 70% of ours are overseas owners.... We have been running around the neighborhood and emailing for weeks....
DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Thanks Jeff. I will check the convenants. Since we are such new owners we were astonished by the increase. That is a lot of help.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Jeff,

WOW! The Board can raise the annual assessments by 115% without a membership vote? My Association is limited to 5% without a membership vote.

Diane,

It's possible that your Association completed a reserve study and identified that the reserves are underfunded. Therefore, the board is attempting to remedy that issue.

As others have said, as long as the procedures outlined in your governing documents were followed, then the Board would have the authority to do this.

You may want to ask for past minutes of the Board meetings to see if this issue was being discussed prior to your purchase (I expect that it was). Then compare this to any document the Association may have completed in your buying process. If they were asked if special assessments were being planned and lied on a document, you might have an actionable item. However, it won't prevent the increase or special assessment from happening or your requirement to pay it.
JeffP6 (Florida)
Posts: 91
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By TimB4 on 11/16/2010 1:20 AM
Jeff,

WOW! The Board can raise the annual assessments by 115% without a membership vote? My Association is limited to 5% without a membership vote.

Diane,

It's possible that your Association completed a reserve study and identified that the reserves are underfunded. Therefore, the board is attempting to remedy that issue.

As others have said, as long as the procedures outlined in your governing documents were followed, then the Board would have the authority to do this.

You may want to ask for past minutes of the Board meetings to see if this issue was being discussed prior to your purchase (I expect that it was). Then compare this to any document the Association may have completed in your buying process. If they were asked if special assessments were being planned and lied on a document, you might have an actionable item. However, it won't prevent the increase or special assessment from happening or your requirement to pay it.

Yah Tim - our lawyer said the same thing when he read the docs - couldnt believe it but no one has come forward to try to get us to change and we have never abused it - most we have doen was 25% and if we get our ammendments passed in Feb we are actually going to decrease by 15%
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Diane,

A quick check of the DE UCIOA did not reveal any limitation on the annual assessment increase nor could I see a section on special assessments. I would suggest a thorough review of your CCRs to see if there is a limit on how much the assessment can be raised during a given year. Copied below is the applicable section of the UCIOA which states a special assessment requires a vote of the members and the annual budget must be ratified by the members. Depending upon the number of members in your assn, a special assessment of $188,500 could be quite sizeable for each member.

ยง 81-324. Adoption of budget.

(a) The executive board shall, at least annually, prepare a proposed budget for the common interest community. In a condominium or cooperative, the proposed budget shall include a line item for any required funding of a repair and replacement reserve. Within 30 days after adoption of any proposed budget after the period of declarant control, the executive board shall provide to all unit owners a summary of the budget, including any reserves and a statement of the basis on which any reserves are calculated and funded. Simultaneously, the executive board shall set a date for a meeting of the unit owners to consider ratification of the budget not less than 14 nor more than 60 days after providing the summary. Unless at that meeting a majority of all unit owners or any larger vote specified in the declaration reject the budget, the budget is ratified, whether or not a quorum is present. If a proposed periodic budget is rejected, the periodic budget last ratified by the unit owners must be continued until such time as the unit owners ratify a subsequent budget proposed by the executive board.

(b) In addition to adoption of its regular periodic budget, the executive board may at any time propose a budget which would require a special assessment against all the units. Except as provided in subsection (c) of this section, the special assessment is effective only if the executive board follows the procedures for ratification of a budget described in subsection (a) of this section and the unit owners do not reject that proposed special assessment.

(c) If the executive board determines by unanimous vote that the special assessment is necessary in order to respond to an emergency, then: (i) the special assessment shall become effective immediately in accordance with the terms of the vote; (ii) notice of the emergency assessment shall be promptly provided to all unit owners; and (iii) the executive board shall spend the funds paid on account of the emergency assessment solely for the purposes described in the vote.

RogerB (Colorado)
Posts: 5,067
Posted:
I am amazed by some of the unbelievable financial management examples posted. Unless there is a major disaster we encourage all HOAs to plan so that they never require a special assessment. The worst case we have had is a townhome association. The 20 reserve plan showed the need to raise the annual assessment 1% greater than the CPI each year for 20 years combined with limiting and prioritizing expenses.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,061
Posted:
Roger,

I believe you hit the nail on the head. The way to plan is to complete a reserve study and adjust assessments, expenses or both to meet the reserves. This plan should then be reviewed every year (to account for inflation) and completely redone every 5 years.

Tim
DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Can't believe the wonderful feedback. Thx so much for your response. It is extremely helpful because we are new to this. So what you are saying (I believe) is that the Board, if they are really doing their job, may have taken a look at the reserves and believes that this 80% increase is truly needed.

A little more background....the builder is done building the end of 2010 and is turning over everything to the owners. 2011 will be first year for Board. The new Board wishes to elevate the standards to a more gated/prestigious community. 9 hole golf course does need work and the boat ramp/inlet area needs to be addressed as well. We were just thinking that 80% increase is outrageous but perhaps not. Just seems that these upgrades could be done over time. I didn't see anything in our Convenants that sets forth any percentage increase. It is not mentioned at all.
DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Hi Mary,

Thank you so much for your very thorough reply. I am so grateful for all the responses. Since we just closed on the condo, we are very new to this and just so taken aback by an 80% increase. I have reviewed the Convenants and there is no mention of any percentage for Annual Assessments. They presented the Budget in addition to the Special Assessment. There was 123 units in attendance. There is a total of 550 units. All 123 Units in attendance voted "No" but they said that whoever did not attend are considered to have Voted "Yes". Not sure Why the vote.

The builder is finished building by the end of 2010. He has owned the property for the past 15 years and has never raised HOA dues by such a percentage. Now it is turned over to this Board and they decided it doesn't live up to their standards. This place is outstandingly beautiful. We must have missed all the sub-standard amenities when we decided to buy.
DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Thanks Tim. Truly appreciate your taking the time to respond. This is so new to us and it comes as quite a surprise. I just never heard of anything going up 80%....certainly in this economy. I believe they do have every right to do this because I checked our convenants and it doesn't say anything at all. Frankly, I am beginning to think that they could raise it to whatever they believe they need. We just think that a better idea would be to do this over time.

Thanks again.

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Diane,

Counting any unvoted ballots as "yes" is certainly not proper and I doubt it is allowed by your bylaws. When a mortgage co is required to vote on an amendment if they do not send in a ballot it can be counted as a yes vote; however, that will be stated in the CCRs. But, counted unvoted member votes as "yes" is certainly not proper.

Developers are notorious for keeping the assessments low so it is not unusual for the first member board to have to raise them. However an increase of 80% does sound quite high even though it may be justified. A look at the budget for 2011 should tell you whether or not it is. It could be that the developer never put anything into a reserve fund either. One other thing, some CCRs or perhaps state laws,require the developer to make up any shortfalls in the operating budget which would also account for increased expenses once the members take over.
DianeM4 (Delaware)
Posts: 6
Posted:
Thanks again Mary for your very informative response to my questions and concerns. I don't see anything in the bylaws that addresses whether no ballot at all assumes it is a "yes" vote. I checked the website and the budget passed. There were 123 attendees at budget mtg and 550 units. Looks like all attendees voted "no" because it was 4.47% disapprove....but it passed.

I do feel a whole lot better since receiving feedback from you and others. I at least have learned that even though 80% sounds high, it makes sense that Developers are notoriously low regarding assessments. If the Board truly addresses all they say they are, we should have a truly "elegant" place and our property values increased substantially....at least that is what we are told.

I'm thinking the best course of action for someone as new as we are, is to take note as to how the money is spent and make sure it is going toward these improvements set forth in the budget.

As for the "yes" vote issue, there are probably people there with a whole lot more experience than I that can address it and if they let it go then perhaps they have determined that it is allowed.

Thanks again for your time and energy. Can't tell you how appreciative we are.

Diane Meyer
DavidA7 (California)
Posts: 179
Posted:
Our developer started with everyone at $170 in 2004. After we became a owner owned HOA review of our CC&R we found out that we had to tier HOA payments and additionally when reviewing our cost we had to substantially raise our rates. By 2006 I was paying $280 and after our reserve study in 2007 up to now I'm paying $352. We have no ammenities on our property but we started with a 10 year old townhome complex with no reserves and now have 20K which is still not enough.

I wish there was some sort of law requiring developers to truly and accurately forecast and indicate true HOA fee's.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
David,

IMO,what is really needed are state laws requiring the developer to fund a reserve account for a fixed % of the annual budget.
JonD1
Posts: 2,350
Posted:
Diane:

Just curious what were your charges before this increase?

And the new amount you are paying?

As to the number of no shows at your meeting. Is this a year round community for most residents? Or do you have many seasonal owners that use this for the Summer as their residence?

Your area and Rehobeth, Ocean City have many seasonal owners who for the most part don't involve themselves much in the operation of the property when they should.

Tough to get some involved when they reside for most of the year elsewhere.

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here