💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

CookieK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Our HOA is denying access to owners of multiple properties who are behind in dues for any unit.
Is this legal? It is my understanding that all parcels are "separate interests", with individual votes and fees and fines for one is completely independent for a second unit which is current in dues.
BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
i would have to see how your rules are exactly worded, but at the moment, I tend to side with the HOA, because otherwise, you could buy 50 lots, and pay the dues on one of them, be in arrears on 49, and still enjoy all the amenities of the HOA... which isn't fair to the other owners.
RyanD1 (California)
Posts: 38
Posted:
Brian:

It would completely be dependent on your governing documents and what kind of powers they give to the Board of Directors. Check and see what it states in the CC&R's about delinquent homeowners and what privileges are revoked.
LoriL1 (Florida)
Posts: 78
Posted:
If you are a Florida HOA you need to refer to Fl. Statute 720.305(2), (2)(a) & (b) and 720.305 (3).

(2)If a member is delinquent for more than 90 days in paying a monetary obligation due the association, an association may suspend, until such monetary obligation is paid, the rights of a member or a member’s tenants, guests, or invitees, or both, to use common areas and facilities and may levy reasonable fines of up to $100 per violation, against any member or any tenant, guest, or invitee. A fine may be levied for each day of a continuing violation, with a single notice and opportunity for hearing, except that a fine may not exceed $1,000 in the aggregate unless otherwise provided in the governing documents. A fine of less than $1,000 may not become a lien against a parcel. In any action to recover a fine, the prevailing party is entitled to collect its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs from the nonprevailing party as determined by the court. The provisions regarding the suspension-of-use rights do not apply to the portion of common areas that must be used to provide access to the parcel or utility services provided to the parcel.

(a)A fine or suspension may not be imposed without at least 14 days’ notice to the person sought to be fined or suspended and an opportunity for a hearing before a committee of at least three members appointed by the board who are not officers, directors, or employees of the association, or the spouse, parent, child, brother, or sister of an officer, director, or employee. If the committee, by majority vote, does not approve a proposed fine or suspension, it may not be imposed. If the association imposes a fine or suspension, the association must provide written notice of such fine or suspension by mail or hand delivery to the parcel owner and, if applicable, to any tenant, licensee, or invitee of the parcel owner.

(b)Suspension of common-area-use rights do not impair the right of an owner or tenant of a parcel to have vehicular and pedestrian ingress to and egress from the parcel, including, but not limited to, the right to park.

(3)If the governing documents so provide, an association may suspend the voting rights of a member for the nonpayment of regular annual assessments that are delinquent in excess of 90 days.

TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Cookie,

Expecting that your Associations governing documents allow the banning then the Association is in it's right. I relate this to someone having multiple credit cards, if they pay all the card in full but one, their credit report still gets a negative report.

The fact that the same owner owns more than one unit and keeps the other assessments paid in full doesn't negate the fact that the owner has failed to keep assessments current for one of the lots. Similar to failing to pay the credit card resulting in a hit on the credit report, failing to keep assessments current results in being banned access to common areas. The owner does not have the choice in deciding that today he will only represent lot A and not lot B, because the owner of lot B failed to pay assessments.

Perhaps this owner should consider selling one or more of the lots if they can not keep the assessments current.

CookieK1 (Florida)
Posts: 2
Posted:
I am not questioning the right of an HOA to suspend rights. My question is regarding the HOA's right to aggregate units when one has a fine and another unit does not. Clearly voting is one example of this. Each unit receives a vote. If one unit is in arrears and one is not, the one in arrears cannot vote however the current unit CAN vote. People are not really members of an HOA as much as the PROPERTY is a member.

Further examples, from Davis-Stirling-

In a planned development, “separate interest” means a separately owned lot, parcel, area, or space.

The Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporations Law-This law provides the basic rules for homeowner association governance. It deals with the aspects of voting rights, manner and timing of notices to members, meetings, and director selection and removal. One very notable application of the Nonprofit Mutual Benefit Corporations Law is that "owners associations" are exempted from the general rule that bars members from holding more than one membership in a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation Thus, an owner of more than one separate interest may hold more than one membership in an association.
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Cookie,

Since you are in Florida, CA law does not apply. Only Florida laws, Federal laws and your governing documents apply.

Membership is typically defined as the owner of a property. You governing documents can clarify.

If we were discussing voting rights, typically governing documents specify one vote per lot. This allows the Association and the owner to differentiate the issue. One member owns lots A,B & C. Assessments are current for Lots A&C but not lot B. Therefore, Lots A & C may cast a vote but not B.

However, your question was discussing ammenities. You will need to check your governing documents, but typically there is language along the lines that the Association has the right to suspend the right to use of the recreational facilities or common area by a member for any period during which any assessment against his Lot remains unpaid. Expecting your documents have similar language, the Association would be in it's right to deny the use of common areas to the member because the assessment against his lot remains unpaid. The action is against the member not the lot.

Question: Are you a member of the Board, the owner of the lot in question, a tenant of the lot in question or just a member of the Association?

Tim

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here