💬 Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Dear HOATalk,

We have a split board 2 to 2 on most issues The fifth (resigning) board member always votes with two of them.

Last general meeting the President planned on resigning, but he didn't tell us that ~~ Before he resigned he reccomended his replacement, then they took a vote ~ it carried with him voteing on this position. (3 to 2)

How can he vote for a replacement when at that time their was NO VACENCY. As soon as the vote carried he resigned.

Under 4.4 of our bylaws it clearly states

VACANCIES
Vacancies in the board caused bu any reason shall be filled by vote of the majority of the "REMAINING" directors ~~ etc. etc.

What is the parliamentary procedure on this matter. And if this is wrong, what can we do about it now..... Shall we take it to small claims court??

The other 2 board members had a person they wanted in, so it would have been a deadlock.

NancyM2
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
What exactly was the motion?

You said he 'recommended' someone for his upcoming vacancy, then you said there was a vote.

Anyway . . . The replacement vote can be declared null and void because it violates your own bylaws.

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Nancy

I agree with Susan, the appointment is invalid as only the remaining directors may appoint a replacement. There is nothing improper for the resigning director to "recommend a replacement, but only the remaining directors may vote on the matter.
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Susan. I don't remember any motion ~~ He just said she (and named ber by name) would be willing to serve on the board, and then they took a vote (3 to 2) THEN he resigned and gave the reason he was selling his house.
NancyM2
SusanW1 (Michigan)
Posts: 5,202
Posted:
Was there a vacancy or not?

WHY would the board vote when there was no vacancy??

No matter if the president resigned later or not, there should have not been a vote if there was not a vacancy.

Besides, the new person is not the new president, just a new board member. Now the shuffle will begin for new officers.

Maybe I'm missing something - I'm not following you, here.
RyanD1 (California)
Posts: 38
Posted:
Nancy:

You can declare that the vote was null and void because it does not follow your By-Laws. Furthermore when the vote was taken, there was no vacancy on the Board.

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
I'm going to disagree with the answers you've received so far in that it all depends on how it was worded. If the president announced: "I am resigning effective at the close of this meeting and I nominate Joe Blow to replace me." Then I would say the vote was valid and proper. I would imagine he did it this way to prevent the Board from being mired in a never ending pi**ing contest to appoint a new member. If you think the person shouldn't be on the BOD then recall them. Otherwise be prepared for expensive and protracted litigation which will do nothing but divide the community further.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Nancy,

Actually there is a case that dates back to 1942 (Mayo v. Interment Properties, Inc.(1942) 53 Cal.App.2d 654) that allows a resigning Board member to appoint their replacement. It references Section 306 of the Civil Code which I don't think exists any longer. It was also for a corporation and since HOA are considered corporations, then I assume this applies. I think at some point in time, the California legislatures need to blend in applicable Corporation Code into the Civil Code (Davis-Stirling Act) and have only one set of rules and interpretation.

NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Dear HOATalk (Richard)

If section 306 of the civil code dosn't exist any longer ~~ would it still apply?

This is the letter I got from the Mgmt Co's representive.
"quote"

I am aware of the By Laws provision from the Association's corporate counsel citing Corporations Code and Calif, case law which acually "trump" the By Laws.

And Yes it is unusual, I have never see anthing like this in my 20+ years in the industry. However if the attorney says it is legal... I am in no position to argue. (end of quote)

Keep in mind, this attorney is friendly with the person that was appointed, as well as the others that voted her in. She has a lot to gain by giving this reccomendation as they don't look at her billing that closely. The other two do...

Another question would be ~~~ Why contact the corporate counsel if it is already addressed in the Bylaws.

NancyM2

RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Nancy

IMO, I don't believe a sitting Board member who is resigning should have the ability to vote on his/her replacement. I believe that this would amount to a conflict of interest as the person being voted on is replacing themselves.

There are two things in our Bylaws, one: All directors shall hold office until their successors are elected (not appointed) and If the Board of Directors accepts the resignation of a director tendered to take effect at a future time, the Board of Members shall have the power to elect a successor to take effect when the resignation is to become effective.

This is another example why homeowners tend to distrust Boards.
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Glen

He didn't say anything during the meeting about resigning ~ but made a motion to appoint this person (which surprised me) ~ It was seconded, and a vote was taken ~~ it carried then he said he was resigning because he needed to sell his house. (he has not lived here for a while)

He then said he had a letter from counsel to confirm that Calif state code would back up this proceedure, and Calif code trumps the Bylaws.

The person that was appointed was not there, however he said he had talked to her and she would be willing to accept the position.

His resigination letter was dated several days before the meeting date, but was contingent on another appointment.(if you can do that)

This attorney that gave this opunion has a lot to gain by this new person being appointed, as a block of three they WON'T be scrutenizing her billing. As it is now our attorney sends in bill's stating~~~ I talked to homeowner ~ (?? time)talked to vendor (?? time)with no explanation of which homeowner or vendor ~ or relateing to what projet or case. The other two did lots of scnitinizing of her billing.

NancyM2

NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
I agree with you Richard, if this is always going to be the case we will have nothing but a "round robin" with the balence of power always being in the greedy corner.

NancyM2
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NancyM2 on 11/05/2010 4:03 PM
I agree with you Richard, if this is always going to be the case we will have nothing but a "round robin" with the balence of power always being in the greedy corner.

NancyM2

AGREED!!
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NancyM2 on 11/05/2010 4:01 PM
Glen

He didn't say anything during the meeting about resigning ~ but made a motion to appoint this person (which surprised me) ~ It was seconded, and a vote was taken ~~ it carried then he said he was resigning because he needed to sell his house. (he has not lived here for a while)

He then said he had a letter from counsel to confirm that Calif state code would back up this proceedure, and Calif code trumps the Bylaws.

The person that was appointed was not there, however he said he had talked to her and she would be willing to accept the position.

His resigination letter was dated several days before the meeting date, but was contingent on another appointment.(if you can do that)

This attorney that gave this opunion has a lot to gain by this new person being appointed, as a block of three they WON'T be scrutenizing her billing. As it is now our attorney sends in bill's stating~~~ I talked to homeowner ~ (?? time)talked to vendor (?? time)with no explanation of which homeowner or vendor ~ or relateing to what projet or case. The other two did lots of scnitinizing of her billing.

NancyM2


I refer you to the following from davis-stirling.combold by poster)The hiccup in the process may be if it wasn't on the agenda but it would probably still require litigation to resolve.

Appointment of Directors
Unless otherwise provided in the articles or bylaws and except for a vacancy created by the removal of a director, vacancies on the board may be filled by approval of a majority of the remaining directors on the board. Corp. Code §7224(a).

Term of Office. The appointed director's term of office shall be as provided for in the bylaws. Appointing a new director does not affect existing officer's term of office. (See difference between officers and directors.)

Selection of Replacement. Because a director retains all of the authority of a director until such time as the resignation becomes effective, the resigning director may participate in the selection of his or her replacement, provided the selection takes place prior to the effective date of the resignation. Mayo v. Interment Properties, Inc.

Open Session. The appointment of a director must be done in open session. filling vacancies does not fall into any of the approved categories for executive session. The appointment needs to be on the meeting's agenda.


Failure to Fill Position. If the board fails or refuses to fill an empty position, the membership may elect a director at any time to fill the position. Corp. Code §7224(b). The process is initiated by filing a petition with the board for a special membership meeting to fill the vacant seat.

Director Letter of Resignation

Written Resignation. A director may resign at any time by submitting an email or a letter of resignation. The writing must be transmitted to the board but it does not need formal acceptance by fellow directors to be effective. Oral resignations are treated differently. A resignation may be withdrawn prior to its effective date.

Effective Date of Resignation. Resigning directors may set the effective dates and times of their resignations. Corp. Code §7224(c). Directors remain in office and continue to fully function as directors until such time as their resignations become effective. They may also participate in the appointment of their replacement.


Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Glen and Nancy

This was the very reason I had my Association eliminate quorum for ANY member meeting. There really is a problem when power is left to the few, instead of the many.
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Dear Richard and Glen

Looks like we are stuck with this appointment, as the attorney has made a judgement based on the case law of Mayo v. Interment properties way back in 1947 (I think that's what she is referring to)when she quotes "case law" of the Calif civil code.

even though our byLaws were not in effect untill the 1970's ~ which clearly state differently. The Mgmt company is going along with the attorney's reccomendation so we have no recourse at this point.

Do you think we should get another attorneys opinion?

Richard ~ the name of the appointee was on the agenda, just her name,, nothing else... but that was handed out at the last minute before the meeting. the other two board members were "blind sided"

GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Nancy IMHO you would be better served to find willing and qualified replacements for the other members and either recall them or wait until their term is up and vote them out.

BTW The new Board member only serves until the old member's term expires unless your CC&R's call for something else. They would then have to face election just as any other Board member.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
NameW (Virginia)
Posts: 74
Posted:
Without burrowing down into State laws, I note that while the size of the Board was mentioned, there was no mention of how many votes the sitting members have. My Board functions on Proxies. Each Board member represents so many homes. Our Covenants and By-Laws provide that proxies may be used for any matter whatsoever, at any time. So that even if there are only 4 members, a split vote is really rare in my universe because it translates as; Jones (33 votes), Harris (19 votes), Billdson (20 votes), Smith (44 votes). Further, with our Association, Proxy votes may be reassigned (in writing) so that if Jones can't attend he can give his proxy votes to Smith (who can also use the Proxies to establish a quorum) and rule the roost with 77 votes if so choosing.

Hypothetically, President Jones does what you describe, then lawfully reassigns their proxy votes to his successor. The remaining votes may not be sufficient to null and void the issue.

With us, in VA, proxies remain valid until such time as the original owner cancels or changes (issues a new proxy to replace the first) them, or when the lot is sold and the proxy expires. In 15 years I have seen 3 proxies cancelled or changed. [And about 100 expire when homes are sold.]
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Yep Glen, that seems to be our only recource ~~~ fortunally we have a very qualified person that is willing to run in the next election. However that will have to be May 2011 (6 months) and a lot of damage could be done before then.

Thanks guys for all your interest and help

NancyM2
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
NameW,

I've never heard of a proxy being valid for more than one year and wonder if your method is even legal. However, the proxy's can only be used for issues that the members vote on. Also, I don't believe the proxy holder has the authority to reassign the proxy; IMO that can only be done by the proxy giver. But regardless, I believe the OP was talking about votes taken at a board meeting where only the board members vote.
GlenL (Ohio)
Posts: 5,491
Posted:
Quote:
Posted By NancyM2 on 11/06/2010 1:57 PM
Yep Glen, that seems to be our only recource ~~~ fortunally we have a very qualified person that is willing to run in the next election. However that will have to be May 2011 (6 months) and a lot of damage could be done before then.

Thanks guys for all your interest and help

NancyM2

Treat the new person with respect and give them a chance, you may be surprised. Treat her as the enemy from the git-go and you can guarantee she will become one.

Studies show that 5 out of 4 people have problems with fractions
NancyM2 (California)
Posts: 249
Posted:
Glen, I think that is the best advice ever..... I certainly agree with you, Give her a chance.... I will pass that along to the other board members Thanks.

Nancy
NameW (Virginia)
Posts: 74
Posted:
MaryA1,
The usefulness of proxies varies from State to State and Covenant to Covenant. In VA our HA is a non-taxable corporation. This state recognizes Proxies especially if mentioned in the By-Laws.

Our HA 'Articles of Incorporation' and our 'By-Laws' (written in the '70s) provide:

"...Election to the Board of Directors shall be by written ballot. At such election the members or their proxies may cast, in respect to each vacancy, as many votes as they are entitled to exercise under the provisions of the Declaration..."

"Any director may be removed from the Board, with or without cause, by a
majority vote of the members of the Association. In the event of death, resignation or removal of a director, his successor shall be selected by the remaining members of the Board and shall serve for the unexpired term
of his predecessor."

"Any officer may be removed from office with or without
cause by the Board. Any officer may resign at any time by giving written notice to the Board, the president or the secretary. Such resignation shall take effect on the date of receipt of such notice or at any later time specified therein, and unless otherwise specified therein, the acceptance of such resignation shall not be necessary to make it effective."

"The presence at the meeting of members entitled to cast, or of proxies entitled to cast one-tenth (1/10) of the votes of each class of membership shall constitute a quorum..."

"...At all meetings of members, each member may vote in person or by proxy. All proxies shall be in writing and filed with the secretary. Every proxy shall be revocable and shall automatically cease upon conveyance by the member of his Lot."

There is similar language in our Covenants. Also some restrictions regarding quorums of larger size for deciding certain issues (selling real estate or amending By-Laws or Covenants, etc.), written notifications for Board meetings, etc. Essentially for our HA purposes a proxy is a (very) limited Power of Attorney.

While it is true that, under Title 13 of the VA Code, proxies can be limited to 11 months, an exception is found when a longer period is expressly provided in the appointment form. [See http://leg1.state.va.us/cgi-bin/legp504.exe?000+cod+13.1-847 for more about how this state handles proxies.] All of our HA's proxy forms specifically stipulate until revoked in writing or a transfer of the lot ownership.

The relevance to your comment is in this state, in our HA, a Proxy can be valid for a very long time if a member doesn't sell their lot. This has freed many owners to designate a written proxy holder, then move away to another state. All of our Board members and Officers are members. All of them have acquired (with the passage of enough years) sufficient proxies so that most of them speaks with the authority of representing a double digit percentage of absentee homeowners.

Needless to say proxies can be hot items for those wishing to have their way. [It reached the stage here a decade ago where the Board and the membership had to agree upon ethics rules to stop poaching on each other's proxy turf. We experienced situations in which two or three different Board members would each present a proxy signed by a mischevous owner, all signed on the same day. Publishing a spreadsheet list of which member spoke for who kind of stopped that.]

MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Name W,

Sorry, but what you describe is happening in your HOA many would consider an abuse of proxy power. That is one reason why proxies have been prohibited by state law in AZ. IMO, your bylaws should be amended to state that a proxy is only valid for the election for which it was issued. For the out of state owners who wish to give a proxy they can send it in after they receive the notice of the annual election.
CharlesH5 (California)
Posts: 9
Posted:
NancyM2 needs to look at the following Davis Sterling Act explanation http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/DirectorResignations/tabid/1364/Default.aspx. It clearly shows that a Director has the legal right to resign based on the appointment of his successor. In fact, the wording used to express this condition is given in the text of the reference. The Bylaws of her Association are superceded by the Davis Stering Act. This is one of the reasons her Association's Board of Directors has undertaken to update both the CC&Rs and Bylaws. The text in the reference is given below.
============================================================================================================

Director Letter of Resignation (from the above web reference site)
Written Resignation. A director may resign at any time by submitting an email or a letter of resignation. The writing must be transmitted to the board but it does not need formal acceptance by fellow directors to be effective. Oral resignations are treated differently. A resignation may be withdrawn prior to its effective date.

Effective Date of Resignation. Resigning directors may set the effective dates and times of their resignations. Corp. Code §7224(c). Directors remain in office and continue to fully function as directors until such time as their resignations become effective. They may also participate in the appointment of their replacement.

Sample Letter. If a director wishes to resign from the board of directors, something similar to the following may be used:



Dear Board [or Dear Fellow Directors]:

Please accept my resignation from the Board of Directors and as an officer of the Board [if an office is held].

My resignation shall take effect immediately or or upon the appointment of my successor. [If the resigning director wants to participate in the selection of his/her successor, the resignation should take effect "upon the appointment of my successor"]

signature: _______________________

Officer Resignations. A different letter should be used if the director intends to only resign as an officer but not as a director.

Read more: Director Resignations http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainIndex/DirectorResignations/tabid/1364/Default.aspx#ixzz14oB4q7if
from Davis-Stirling.com by Adams Kessler PLC
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Charles

The Davis-Stirling Act and Corporation Code are two specific statues. One, Davis-Stirling Act deal solely with HOA's. Corporation Code deals with corporations such as HOA's.

Your reference deals with Corporation Code, not the Davis Stirling Act. Resignations are dealt with by Corporations and a parliamentary procedure, such as Robert's Rule of Order.

🎯 You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • ✓ Ask follow-up questions
  • ✓ Share your experience
  • ✓ Get expert advice
  • ✓ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account →

⚡ Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here