๐Ÿ’ฌ Join us to post & get advice from 50,000 HOA & Condo leaders.

Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in

HowardL (California)
Posts: 2
Posted:
Our HOA has been dealing with a problem homeowner for several years. We have about 100 homes in our development (about 20 years old). Our CCRs have numerous prohibitions on parking commercial / recreational / trailer-type vehicles within the development (non-gated). The homeowner has claimed that, since the streets are public, the CCRs are not enforceable. If an RV can be parked within the development, it clearly invalidates the spirit (and intention) of the CCRs. Any suggestions or ideas?
RichardP13 (California)
Posts: 1,767
Posted:
Howard,

Maybe this will help you.

Recreational Vehicles
QUESTION: The language in my CC&Rs states that "there will be no RV parking on the public street within the development". Can the HOA control public street parking?

ANSWER: Yes. Even though local ordinances may allow RV parking on public streets, such ordinances do not invalidate private restrictions unless the ordinance specifically provides otherwise. Your CC&Rs are recorded covenants (promises) made by each owner to the other owners and to the association. If the owners covenant not to park their RVs on streets within the community or adjacent to it, the promise can be enforced by the other owners or the association or both.

Restrictions. Associations cannot restrict the general public but it can restrict the actions of its members, and members' family, guest, and invitees. That is the nature of living in a common interest development. If the CC&Rs restrict parking, and owners buy into the development, such owners automatically become members of the association and are bound by the association's restrictions.

Reasonableness. By statute, restrictions are fully enforceable if they are reasonable. Civil Code ยง1354(a). The reasoning behind parking restrictions is to preserve property values by regulating aesthetics. A number of cases have recognized the authority of governmental entities to control "visual blight." The cases specifically dealt with the right to restrict the parking of recreational vehicles, motor homes, trailers, boats, commercial vehicles, inoperable vehicles, and the like. Such reasoning extends to community associations.

Read more: RVs & Motor Homes http://www.davis-stirling.com/MainMenu/MainIndex/RVsMotorHomes/tabid/1532/Default.aspx#ixzz1467TixsY
from Davis-Stirling.com by Adams Kessler PLC
TimB4 (Tennessee)
Posts: 21,059
Posted:
Howard,

This is something that has been brought up on several occassions.

Some have said that the Association's control ends when you are on public property.

Some have said as your Board said, that the Association has control because people agreed to the "contract" they entered into which says that they must obey association guidelines.

Some have said that because members agreed to obey the rules and guidelines then the Association can enforce parking restrictions on public streets on members but not their guests because they are not members and did not agree to the contact.

Some States have enacted laws trying to clarify this disagreement.

Bottom line is, if either the Association or the member wants to press the issue, then it will end up in court and someone won't like the result.

BrianB (California)
Posts: 2,820
Posted:
good advice here, tim summed it up. I believe courts have ruled (but don't quote me) that since it is a contractual agreement between private parties (the HOA and the Owner/Buyer), that yes, the HOA can restrict 'activities" on public streets. It would be no different than if I signed a contract with my company to purchase and drive only Ford vehicles, or only Pick up trucks.

It's a contract. It's enforceable, in the absence of any issues that would make the contract illegal.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Howard,

What it really boils down to is this. In the absence of case law or state law in CA prohibiting an HOA from restricting parking on public streets, the HOA may continue to restrict parking on public streets. This particular CCR restriction is no different than all the other CCRs restrictions, in that this member agreed to it by virtue of buying their property in the HOA and is therefore bound to abide by it. And that, btw, is how courts have ruled in other states regarding this particular restriction.
ElbyJ
Posts: 29
Posted:
My recommendation would be to check your local city codes if the streets are considered as public property. Our city has very strict codes concerning parking of RV's on the street and in driveways. I just wish these same codes would apply to our gated community HOA. In our CC&R's we have a statement concerning not allowing RV's, boats, non-registered/non-inspected vehicles to be parked at a residence at all. However, in trying to enforce the CC&R our laywer determined the referenced paragraph in the CC&R was not enforceable, therefore, a homeowner could keep their non-registered/non-inspected vehicle in their driveway. The local city Marshall's office tried to assist us also, but the most they could do was put a door knob hanger notice on their door. The owner replied to the Marshall's office with a "keep your nose out of our business"! We have even tried to get a contract with a local towing company, but they will not discuss anything formal without a statement in our HOA documents stating we have the authority to tow. I just wish we could only use the city codes, as things would be a lot less complicated for the HOA board in dealing with residents. As the president, I sure get tired of getting down on my knees to beg an owner to do anything.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Elby,

I'm sure you're not getting down on your knees and begging! However, I sure hope you are sending violations letters and levying fines. If the fines remain unpaid for a certain period of time then the assn should be putting a lien on the member's property. The enforcement and fine policy should be sent to the members and the members should know that it will be enforced to the letter.

ElbyJ
Posts: 29
Posted:
Mary -- that sounds like a perfect HOA world -- but this one is not! The majority of our bylaws were written so they are unforceable. Therefore, that is why we can only send the resident a notification letter asking them to correct what is wrong. We can point a rifle at the occupant, but all we have loaded is blanks! We have a set of HOA documents that cannot be modified since a change requires approval of 100% of the homeowners, approval by all mortgage companies, and approval by the VA. The documents will never expire as they just keep being automatically renewed.
MaryA1 (Arizona)
Posts: 388
Posted:
Elby,

OK, so I'm thinking your docs do not provide for levying fines. Has your board thought to consult with an HOA attorney to see if there is something that can be done outside of levying fines which would lead to liens? BTW, I would look in the CCRs instead of the bylaws.
ElbyJ
Posts: 29
Posted:
Yes, we have already consulted our attorney on this subject. They are the ones that have indicated our CC&R's were written very loose and have not enforcement of any kind. This leads back to the "Mother May I" clause!

๐ŸŽฏ You've read this entire discussion

Join the conversation with 50,000 HOA & Condo Leaders:

  • โœ“ Ask follow-up questions
  • โœ“ Share your experience
  • โœ“ Get expert advice
  • โœ“ Access 350,000 discussions
Create Free Account โ†’

โšก Takes 30 seconds

Already a member? Log in here