Quote:
Posted By MaryA1 on 10/28/2010 2:36 PM
Tim.
As Barbara stated this is a matter of a member spreading false allegations about the board -- saying they are violating the law when they are not. IMO, the board should ask their attorney to send a letter to this person advising them to cease and desist or legal action will be taken against them. I do not think this should be ignored! If this member continues to spread false accusations after receiving a letter from the attorney then a court action would certainly be justified. Whereas any member may have a right to state their "observations" (as you mention), if those observations amount to a pack of lies then it certainly is not justified and should not be condoned, much less allowed.
Mary,
I'm not saying to ignore the problem. The Board can not and should not ignore an issue like this. Per the OP, the lawyer, who had all the information, offered advise of not to pursue legal action. Glenn gave excellent advise on how to address the issue without using legal action. Others offered advise of threatening legal action. I pointed out how threatening legal action can backfire in this type of issue. It might not backfire and completely resolve the issue. I believe in offering as many options as I see along with the pros and cons as I see them. The final decision would be that of the individual, or in this case the Board.
If the Board chooses to threaten legal action, that is their right and a possible way to remedy the issue. I only wanted to point out, though an example, that threatening legal action could cause more problems then the false accusations were.
I believe that one could argue that if an individual agrees to run for a position on the Board or serve on a committee, that the individual is placed into the public spot light (similar to any elected public official). Granted the individuals "public" would be limited to just the membership and residents of the Association, but they are certainly no longer a private individual. Therefore, one would be subject to general characterizations just like is done with members of congress. It is permissible to say in your opinion all members of congress are crooks. You may not say Representative [insert name] is a crook without proof.
Since we do not know what the issues are, we do not know what the background is and we do not know what perceived facts the member is seeing for the basis of their opinion it's difficult to offer specific advise. I'm offering advise, as others are, based on the information available and personal experience. If the member is saying the Board is a bunch of crooks, then I believe that they are in their constitutional right to voice that opinion. However, if they said [insert name] is a crook and failed to have the facts to back it up then that is slander or libel (depending on if it was written or verbal). If it is slander or libel, then the individual named would have action against the individual saying it - not the Association.
That's my two cents.
Tim