KristineW1 (Washington)
Posts: 4
Posts: 4
Posted:
Hello,
We have language in our CC&Rs (not the bylaws)pertaining to the preservation of views. Basically it states that you will maintain the height of your trees on your lot so that they don't impede on the view of your neighbor. The cost of the maintenance of the trees is on the shoulders of the tree owner.
We currently have a litigation against the Board and the Association because of a vacant lot owner not keeping their trees maintained. The member who is suing states that the Board did not do enforce the CC&R's when requested to assist between neighbors, therefore his view is not fully restored. He actually sued the lot owner (they did a marginal job) and then sued the Board bcuz they did not enforce the CC&R's and protect his view rights. This litigation has been going on for two years now.
There are a couple of other Members who are requesting trees to be taken down or trimmed....but the Tree's owner states that they were legally advised that they should not do anything to maintain their trees until the litigation between the other Member and the Board is final. Does that make sense? The Members are getting mad and I believe they will sue, now we will have 3 lawsuits vs. 1.
Any body else dealing with "view" issues? Any feedback re: resolution?
We have language in our CC&Rs (not the bylaws)pertaining to the preservation of views. Basically it states that you will maintain the height of your trees on your lot so that they don't impede on the view of your neighbor. The cost of the maintenance of the trees is on the shoulders of the tree owner.
We currently have a litigation against the Board and the Association because of a vacant lot owner not keeping their trees maintained. The member who is suing states that the Board did not do enforce the CC&R's when requested to assist between neighbors, therefore his view is not fully restored. He actually sued the lot owner (they did a marginal job) and then sued the Board bcuz they did not enforce the CC&R's and protect his view rights. This litigation has been going on for two years now.
There are a couple of other Members who are requesting trees to be taken down or trimmed....but the Tree's owner states that they were legally advised that they should not do anything to maintain their trees until the litigation between the other Member and the Board is final. Does that make sense? The Members are getting mad and I believe they will sue, now we will have 3 lawsuits vs. 1.
Any body else dealing with "view" issues? Any feedback re: resolution?