Posted:
Monday, November 20
Hello, Bonnie, Iāve noted my reply to your questions/comments in brackets. Also, the last entry to your question below is that I sent my reply to you directly via your email address only because in the Original Subject line it has an ā11/15ā date and I figured I wouldnāt get a response from you. Hope to hear from you soonā¦.!!! -ReneeD
Hi Renee - Sorry for my delayed response - please see my replies below in CAPS. Good luck -Bonnie
************************
Posted:11/18/2006 11:25 PM Quote Reply
Bonnie, now is my turn to apologize for not getting back to you sooner!
Basically, 11/15 meeting adjourned because of no quorum met (only 2 of 5 BOD members showed, another homeowner and myself. Although I did inform our PM that ample notice was not given to homeowners, she said it didn't matter and, that it had always been done this way. Because I know she knows better and that she knows that I caught her lying when she said that really upset her. Ultimatey she refused to discuss it further with me and walked away.
ACTUALLY, I AM SURPRISED THAT YOUR PM EVIDENTLY DID NOT "KEEP AFTER" THE BOD TO APPROVE THE DRAFT BUDGET FOR RELEASE IN A TIMELY MANNER SO AS TO ENSURE THAT THE PROPOSED BUDGET WAS MAILED TO THE HOs TO COMPLY WITH THE 30-DAY REQUIREMENT. AND, THE ACCOUNTABILITY GOES THE OTHER WAY, ALSO - THE PRES. SHOULD HAVE ENSURED THAT THE BUDGET WAS APPROVED VIA THE APPROPRIATE MOTION AT A PRIOR MEETING ENSURING THAT THE PM WOULD BE ABLE TO SEND IT TO THE HOs EARLY ENOUGH TO ALLOW FOR THE 30 DAY COMMENT PERIOD. DID YOU PRES. HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS (OR, WAS THAT PERSON ABSENT)?
REPLY FROM RENEE: Our BOD meetings, open to HOās, are held every other month. I can only assume they might have met in an āoff monthā to discuss proposed budget for the PM to date the letter ā11/04ā and, our Pres not following through is par for the course. Pres did not attend 11/15. Actually, now that I am looking at the calendar the timing of events is off anyway. No Agenda was available to homeowners at the October 17th meeting which was rescheduled from the 11th and, Iām assuming they must have discussed the Budget in Executive Session as it was not mentioned during the BOD meeting. BTW, whenever our BOD goes into Executive Session homeowners are told to leave. Since I do attend every meeting, I would think that our PMās Management Report and Meeting Agenda would include any BOD actions taken and that it be ratified in Meeting Minutes. Anyway, no one will ever know if the Meeting Minutes reflect decisions arrived from any Executive session meetings because Minutes are not read aloud and are not readily available to any homeowner. So, if I am reading correctly what youāre saying is that the BOD shouldāve approved the proposed āDraftā Budget at the October 17th meeting, then scheduling the next meeting sometime after November 20th to adopt the Annual Budget for Y2007 as it stands or with recommended changes from homeownerās input?
Aside from that, I did have a few other questions I directed to the Board Treasurer (which is like pulling teeth!) and the answers I received concerning our finances especially the financial health of our Reserves troubles me. What it boils down to is that the BOD is communicating no increase for next year and, prefers not to impose a special assessment;
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE SHOULD BE AT LEAST A MINIMAL INCREASE EACH YEAR TO KEEP UP WITH INFLATION. THE RESERVE PLANS I HAVE SEEN ALSO RECOMMEND AN ANNUAL INCREASE TO THE RESERVE ACCOUNT.
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS SHOULD BE A LAST RESORT APPROACH.
REPLY FROM RENEE: Personally, I do not think anyone really understands this. This is the first year (2007) that a line item has been created in our Operating Fund specifically for a Reserve Study. I also think this BOD thinks they are doing us a favor by not increasing our fee and, (2) I am getting the sneaking suspicion that when this reserve study is done which has been earmarked as a 20 year recommended guideline āwhatever that meansāwe ARE going to get slapped with a huge increase. I wish I could go into more detail with you from what Iāve read in our Decs on how our monthly fee is calculated; what I still donāt quite understand is how or how much actually should be going into our Reserves.
however, a line item for a reserves study was created and, if it is determined that we are underfunded we may incur a large increase in our asssessments.
ARE YOU SAYING THAT THE LINE ITEM FOR THE RESERVE WAS CREATED FOR THE 2007 PROPOSED BUDGET, OR, HAS IT BEEN IN THE PRECEEDING BUDGETS? HAS A RESERVE STUDY BEEN PERFORMED? OR, IS ONE PLANNED? IT WOULD PROVIDE A PROPOSED FUNDING PLAN.
REPLY FROM RENEE: Yes, Reserve Study created for Y2007. The BOD talked about a reserve study earlier this year but nothing was ever done. The Pres at the time said that they wanted to get all major projects done and out of the way before they do a Reserve Study. IMO, our total cash assets are about 50% less than one year ago!
Also, our Reserves are set up so that a certain percentage is allocated into 6 separate projects e.g., unrestricted, roofs, streets/parkways, siding, driveways, playground) but both the Treasurer and the PM informed me that for the past two years deposits on capital expenditures were deposited only into the unrestricted reserve account.
OK - IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU HAVE HAD THE LINE ITEM FOR THE RESERVE FOR SOME TIME... YOUR RESERVE ANALYSIS SHOULD CONTAIN A FUNDING PLAN FOR THE NEXT 20 YEARS (I.E., FROM THE DATE THE ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED) AND ADDRESS THE AMOUNT TO BE FUNDED INTO EACH OF THE 6 ACCOUNTS.
REPLY FROM RENEE: I think our Reserves were originally created back in ā91 or ā92. I know a Reserve Study was done in ā93 and, that for the most part, we had been funding (6)future improvements I referred to above. What I recently learned at the 11/15 meeting was for the past 2 years the monthly amount is being deposited into our Unrestricted Reserves ONLY!!!
Following is what I found in our Declarations:
CAPITAL RESERVE: The Association shall segregate and maintain special reserve accounts to be used solely for making capital expenditures in connection with the Community Area and Dwelling Unit Exteriors (the āCapital Reserveā). The Board shall determine the appropriate level of the Capital Reserve based on a periodic review of the useful life of improvements to the Community Area, the Dwelling Unit Exteriors and other property owned by the Association and periodic projections of the cost of anticipated major repairs or replacements to the Community Area, the Dwelling Unit Exteriors and the purchase of other property to be used by the Association in connection with its duties hereunder. Each budget shall disclose that percentage of the Community Assessment which shall be added to the Capital Reserve and each Owner shall be deemed to make a capital contribution to the Association equal to such percentages multiplied by each installment of the Community Assessment paid by such Owner.
THE BOD SHOULD BE FUNDING THE RESERVE ACCOUNT(S) PER THE FUNDING PLAN, ALTHOUGH THEY DO HAVE SOME DISCRETION. BUT, ULTIMATELY, THEY MUST ABIDE BY THEIR FIDUCIARY DUTY - THEY MUST ACT IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE, AND, THEY MUST MAKE THEIR DECISIONS IN A REASONED FASHION AFTER SEEKING APPROPRIATE ADVICE.
THERE IS A GOOD 3-PART SERIES: "CALL OF DUTY, WHAT IS FIDUCIARY DUTY?" - IN THE NEWSLETTER BY LIEBERMAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, "ACROSS THE BOARD" (SPRING - SUMMER 2006). THEIR WEBSITE IS: WWW.LIEBERMANMANAGEMENT.COM (I AM NOT ENDORSING THE COMPANY AS I HAVE NO KNOWLEDGE OF THEIR
COMPANY. BUT THEIR NEWSLETTER DOES CONTAIN USEFUL INFO)
It appears this BOD can direct money wherever it pleases but how they are doing it bothers me. Shouldn't this have been communicated to the homeowners? Why the ruse of 6 accounts? Especially since one of those accounts was earmarked 3 years ago for a new playground (old one was demo'd). The way it looks now I don't think there is even enough money (in our reserves alone) for our ongoing roof replacement project next year--we try to complete 4-5 buildings each year.
IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU NEED MORE INFO THAN APPARENTLY YOUR BOD IS WILLING TO ANSWER TO. YOU CAN VIEW THE ASSOCIATION'S FILES AT THE PM OFFICE (PER IL CONDO LAW) WITH APPROPRIATE NOTICE. YOU CAN ALSO PHOTOCOPY DOCUMENTS. BASICALLY, THE ONLY PORTIONS OF THE FILES THAT CAN NOT BE DISCLOSED ARE RELATED TO ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS AGAINST HOs. IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN THE RESERVE ANALYSIS, IT MIGHT HELP ANSWER SOME OF YOUR QUESTIONS RE NUMBER OF RESERVE ACCOUNTS AND HOW IT IS TO BE FUNDED. YOU CAN ALSO CHECK THE PROPOSED AND PAST BUDGETS TO SEE IF THE RESERVE IS BEING FUNDED ADEQUATELY. THERE SHOULD ALSO BE INFO RE ACTUAL COST OF THE ROOFING PROJECT AND THE ROOFING CONTRACT, EOY ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS SHOWING ALL OF THE EXPENDTURES FOR THAT YEAR AND HOW THE HOA STANDS, FINANCIALLY, AT YEAR CLOSE - PLUS, THE FINANCIALS (USUALLY DONE ON A MONTHLY BASIS), MEETING MINUTES, ETC.
REPLY FROM RENEE: This Mgmt Co, PM, and our BOD has made it difficult or near impossible to look ālet alone receive any information. I have told them as it is a portion of my money that funds all these projects and indirectly pays our PMās salary that I have a right to access this information. Homeowners are directed to request information through the Management Company who in turn submits it to the BOD for their approval. But, if you have a disorganized PM who rarely if ever returns phone calls, loses paperwork and is never prepared for meetings then I think you get a pretty good picture of what I am up against! The BOD takes it one notch further ---they completely ignore most homeowner requests.
I don't profess to be an expert in property management but I am so frustrated and feel like I am the only homeowner taking any active interest. I could say more but need to come up for more air--so to speak. Hope to hear your thoughts/comments soon..? Thanks. -ReneeD
PLEASE KNOW THAT I AM NO EXPERT EITHER - SIMPLY A HO WHO HAS BEEN ON OUR BOD FOR ~12 YEARS AND PRES. FOR MANY OF THOSE YEARS. OUR HOA HAS BEEN FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE AN EXCELLENT PM WHO HELPS US KEEP ON TRACK WITH EVERYTHING. PLUS, I AM PROACTIVE (TO THE POINT OF MY BOARD MEMBERS COMPLAINING "ENOUGH ALREADY") BECAUSE I HAVE SEARCHED OUT ANY AND ALL INFO AND SENT IT TO THEM FOR THEIR OWN EDUCATION. PERHAPS YOU SHOULD CONSIDER RUNNING FOR THE BOD AND GETTING INVOLVED IN HOW THE HOA AFFAIRS ARE BEING MANAGED.
I UNDERSTAND AND EMPATHIZE WITH YOUR FRUSTRATION. YOU ARE A GEM OF A HO TO BE TAKING AN ACTIVE INTEREST! 99.9% OF HOs, IN MY EXPERIENCE, DO NOT GET INVOLVED (EXCEPT WHEN THERE IS SOMETHING TO COMPLAIN ABOUT!). :-)
REPLY FROM RENEE: Thank you for your kind words. I will keep persisting until I am satisfied with answers to my questions. In the meanwhile, I believe part of the problem within our community is turnover of home ownership, apathy and I hope I am being politically correct when I say that Iāve noticed a greater number of a certain ethnic origin are making this their home here as well. Therein lies another hurdle this BOD needs to master.
BY THE WAY...IN YOUR RESPONSE, DID YOU DO SOMETHING THAT RESULTED IN HOATALK.COM SENDING ME AN EMAIL MESSAGE INFORMING ME YOU HAD RESPONDED? SINCE I HAVE NOT BEEN LOGGING INTO THE DISCUSSION FORUM VERY OFTEN, IT WAS USEFUL KNOWING YOU HAD RESPONDED. OF COURSE, I DID NOT GO INTO MY EMAIL ALL WEEKEND!