ChristinaR (Maryland)
Posts: 99
Posts: 99
Posted:
Last night at our monthly BOD meeting, the BOD 'acted in the capacity of the Arch Committee' and approved 3 Arch Review Applications including one belonging to a Board Member. The reason they were acting as the committee is because they had not read the documents and realized that the committee is defined in the CCRs and requires 3 or more members. Only one Member was appointed in September at our annual meeting. About 20 minutes after they approved these applications, they appointed the rest of the committee.
One Homeowner has requested that the new Arch Committee review the applications due to the fact that they were not the "Architectural Committee."
We have been told by an Association Attorney, that the BOD cannot 'act in the capacity of any committee' unless it is stated in our CCRs. Does anyone know if this is true? Our documents do not list it as a duty of a board member nor is it under any of the committees. I really have read these documents inside and out and cannot find anything.
Is this Homeowner right? Should the Applications be turned over to the Arch Committee and reviewed (again)? I know this sounds like a waste of time, but the Attorney has said that any 'stipulations' that were added may not be able to be upheld unless approved and/or denied by the actual Committee Members. For example, one application was approved to install a fence with the stipulation that the fence not be painted or stained until a color has been submitted for approval.
Also, this Board Member did not abstain from the vote taken, nor did they even mention that one of the homes was theirs. The address was on the agenda and the Homeowner made the connection after the meeting. Should the Board Member have abstained from the vote?
The Homeowner feels as though this Board Member rushed the rest of the board through the vote. One of the Board Members had never even seen the plans and was still reviewing them when the Board Member asked 3 times..."Do I have a motion to approve these Architectural Applications?"
What should or does the BOD need to do to rectify this situation?
Thanks for any feedback.
One Homeowner has requested that the new Arch Committee review the applications due to the fact that they were not the "Architectural Committee."
We have been told by an Association Attorney, that the BOD cannot 'act in the capacity of any committee' unless it is stated in our CCRs. Does anyone know if this is true? Our documents do not list it as a duty of a board member nor is it under any of the committees. I really have read these documents inside and out and cannot find anything.
Is this Homeowner right? Should the Applications be turned over to the Arch Committee and reviewed (again)? I know this sounds like a waste of time, but the Attorney has said that any 'stipulations' that were added may not be able to be upheld unless approved and/or denied by the actual Committee Members. For example, one application was approved to install a fence with the stipulation that the fence not be painted or stained until a color has been submitted for approval.
Also, this Board Member did not abstain from the vote taken, nor did they even mention that one of the homes was theirs. The address was on the agenda and the Homeowner made the connection after the meeting. Should the Board Member have abstained from the vote?
The Homeowner feels as though this Board Member rushed the rest of the board through the vote. One of the Board Members had never even seen the plans and was still reviewing them when the Board Member asked 3 times..."Do I have a motion to approve these Architectural Applications?"
What should or does the BOD need to do to rectify this situation?
Thanks for any feedback.